« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA  (Read 3864 times)

Offline Klam

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 253
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #60 on: September 26, 2011, 05:24:40 AM »
Quote from: RTHolmes on September 26, 2011, 03:49:51 AM
not much chance of that I'm afraid. I'm getting really bored of these two derailing every thread with (Image removed from quote.)



Nice one Holmes  :rofl

I see the 2 numbnuts in nearly every thread.
Logged
=Anglo-Saxon=


ingame ID: Petrol

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #61 on: September 26, 2011, 05:58:01 AM »
make it a post it!  :aok
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #62 on: September 26, 2011, 12:35:22 PM »
Quote from: Guppy35 on September 25, 2011, 09:37:21 PM
Any chance you two can not ruin a perfectly reasonable thread by trying to get the last word with each other on something off topic anyway?
The funny thing is Guppy there both uping their postcount by posting stupid things.  Skorpion your arguments are funny since you call him out on postcounts every post as you post back to up yours :D
Logged
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #63 on: September 26, 2011, 03:26:00 PM »
Quote from: ACE on September 26, 2011, 12:35:22 PM
The funny thing is Guppy there both uping their postcount by posting stupid things.  Skorpion your arguments are funny since you call him out on postcounts every post as you post back to up yours :D
he is postcounting most of the time. a single smiley doesnt say much.

at least i have an argument in my replies. :rolleyes:
Logged

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #64 on: September 26, 2011, 05:28:56 PM »
:)
Logged
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #65 on: September 26, 2011, 05:35:31 PM »
Logged

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #66 on: September 26, 2011, 07:12:16 PM »
Logged
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #67 on: September 26, 2011, 07:21:43 PM »
Logged

Offline JOACH1M

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9813
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #68 on: September 26, 2011, 07:25:37 PM »
Tyrannis vs. Skorpion

discuss :D
Logged
FEW ~ BK's ~ AoM
Focke Wulf Me / Last Of The GOATS 🐐
ToC 2013 & 2017 Champ
R.I.P My Brothers <3

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #69 on: September 26, 2011, 07:39:24 PM »
Logged
Quote from: guncrasher on August 16, 2012, 04:48:31 AM

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #70 on: September 26, 2011, 09:28:41 PM »
Who cares about post  count, and why the heck do you two want to ruin the thread?  Can't you insult each other via PM?
Logged
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #71 on: September 26, 2011, 09:42:45 PM »
Quote from: JOACH1M on September 26, 2011, 07:25:37 PM
Tyrannis vs. Skorpion

discuss :D

Signal to noise ratio zero <and dropping fast>
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Scotty55OEFVet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #72 on: September 26, 2011, 10:43:40 PM »
Quote from: PFactorDave on September 24, 2011, 05:24:33 PM
mmmmm

Ki84-Ib, now that would be a plane I would spend my pile of perkies on.
:huh :huh :huh
Logged
"War can only be abolished through war...in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."



RedDevil

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #73 on: September 26, 2011, 10:59:42 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on September 24, 2011, 04:48:06 PM
Ki-84-Ib This version of the Ki-84 has four 20mm Ho-5 cannons and possibly a slightly uprated engine.  It might be a low end perk plane.

Tiny bit lighter than our current Ki-84 too, and yes a small increase of power. The only changes needed to introduce this variant are a tiny modification to the external 3d model (cowling gun port holes different size & shape), those two small revisions to the flight model and the later instrument panel including different breaches to the cowl guns.
Logged
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA
« Reply #74 on: September 27, 2011, 03:33:23 AM »
How well do you think the A-26 would fare as a fighter in the LWMA?  If not well, how well could it intercept bomber formations?  Does it have a place in this thread?
Logged
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up
« previous next »