Author Topic: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW  (Read 4241 times)

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2011, 09:45:02 AM »
Damn.  Mid-afternoon.  Well, maybe next time.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2011, 09:51:09 AM »
I know it's not K4s but G6s can do the job :)
against spit9s? not unless the spits can be dragged down under 22k. will be interesting to see the aircraft lineup.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Online Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7894
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #17 on: October 02, 2011, 10:12:54 AM »
against spit9s? not unless the spits can be dragged down under 22k. will be interesting to see the aircraft lineup.

sigh...    :bhead

from the rules writeup:

A strong downwind will be enabled at 26k ft.
B-25's and Ju 88's may not fly higher than 20k ft.

As for the spit9 v 109g6... decent matchup that gets real interesting in the 12-20k alt range, with both trading speed/climb and wep advantages. The bigger variable will be if the G6's are allowed/forced gondies.

I'd say from experience, spits vs their contemporary 109 opponent is usually a decent matchup. Let's not forget "tactics" either - yanno?  :noid
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2011, 10:29:44 AM »
i'll be there in a 190 :)
-AoM-

Offline DrBone1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4896
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2011, 10:31:21 AM »
A5s all the way.  :rock
=The Damned=
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6jjnCoBobc
I see DrBone has found a new Sith apprentice. Good, good, let the hate flow through you.  :devil
Move up, move over, or move aside.  Simple kombat 101.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2011, 02:14:42 PM »
against spit9s? not unless the spits can be dragged down under 22k. will be interesting to see the aircraft lineup.

It's as even a fight as is possible as the airwar was in 43 over France.  If you grumble about this match up, there is no match up that will please you :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2011, 03:23:10 PM »
It's as even a fight as is possible as the airwar was in 43 over France.  If you grumble about this match up, there is no match up that will please you :)

QFT
-AoM-

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15718
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2011, 03:36:11 PM »
We have Spit IX's, Spit V's, Typhoons, Mossies, and B-25C's vs. Bf 109G-6's, FW 190A-5's, FW 190F-8's, and Ju 88's.

We heavily bias the plane set to putting in what aircraft were actually there.  Even if we didn't, there are no scenarios that have the same plane set on each side, so there are going to be disparities.  However, in scenarios, it depends more on the mix of aircraft, the strategies and tactics of the sides, and that the fights are often many on many than how any one particular plane stacks up vs. any other one particular plane.  In this case, the team feels it's close enough (consider Zeros vs. P-40's; Bf 109G-6's and FW 190A's vs. P-51's, P-47's, and P-38's at 34k alt; La-5's vs. 109K-4's; etc. -- and those work out fine in a scenario environment).

Also, I keep in mind that, in real life, folks flew these aircraft and did well in them -- so it can be done.

Me, I will probably be in a FW 190A-5 and have been flying them in the MA for practice.  :aok

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2011, 04:10:10 PM »
We have Spit IX's, Spit V's, Typhoons, Mossies, and B-25C's vs. Bf 109G-6's, FW 190A-5's, FW 190F-8's, and Ju 88's.

We heavily bias the plane set to putting in what aircraft were actually there.  Even if we didn't, there are no scenarios that have the same plane set on each side, so there are going to be disparities.  However, in scenarios, it depends more on the mix of aircraft, the strategies and tactics of the sides, and that the fights are often many on many than how any one particular plane stacks up vs. any other one particular plane.  In this case, the team feels it's close enough (consider Zeros vs. P-40's; Bf 109G-6's and FW 190A's vs. P-51's, P-47's, and P-38's at 34k alt; La-5's vs. 109K-4's; etc. -- and those work out fine in a scenario environment).

Also, I keep in mind that, in real life, folks flew these aircraft and did well in them -- so it can be done.

Me, I will probably be in a FW 190A-5 and have been flying them in the MA for practice.  :aok

Well said. The scenario environment is a different beast. Often times, I find aircraft that may not do so well in the MA, shine in Scenarios when flown to their strengths, and vice versa.
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #24 on: October 02, 2011, 04:49:06 PM »
sigh...    :bhead

from the rules writeup:

A strong downwind will be enabled at 26k ft.
B-25's and Ju 88's may not fly higher than 20k ft.

As for the spit9 v 109g6... decent matchup that gets real interesting in the 12-20k alt range, with both trading speed/climb and wep advantages. The bigger variable will be if the G6's are allowed/forced gondies.

I'd say from experience, spits vs their contemporary 109 opponent is usually a decent matchup. Let's not forget "tactics" either - yanno?  :noid
bite me shane. true the real interesting fights are going to be 12-20k, but i know what typically happens in these special events, the alt limits get pushed as far as they can and at 25k the ah version of the 109g6 starts wallowing like a pig in mud where the spit9 is turning into a thoroughbred. anyone who has spent any real time in ah spits knows it too.



Also, I keep in mind that, in real life, folks flew these aircraft and did well in them -- so it can be done.
no offense brooke the cm's do a great job putting events together and i realize it's as even as can be had within ah, but real life 109 pilots were also known to turn tail and run before a fight could occur when they believed they could not win.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2011, 04:50:53 PM by gyrene81 »
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Big Rat

  • AH Training Corps
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #25 on: October 02, 2011, 06:46:25 PM »
Replace some of the G6's with G2's and I would be much more tempted, right now G6's vs Spit9's at 25k, ehh..

 :salute
BigRat
When you think the fight might be going bad, it already has.
Becoming one with the Hog, is to become one with Greatness, VF-17 XO & training officer BigRat

Offline AKKuya

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #26 on: October 02, 2011, 07:56:54 PM »
It seems that a few are stressing the spit vs 109 match-up.  Has those individuals looked at the the frame objectives and map?  Depending on the two oppossing CO's battleplans per individual frame, how often will these two planes out of the entire planeset actually meet at the same altitude and in equal numbers?

It will happen but the fluidity of war will create unique situations that many will call the glorious battles of RAF vs LW.  Only the victors of those unique situations will say that. :devil
Chuck Norris can pick oranges from an apple tree and make the best lemonade in the world. Every morning when you wake up, swallow a live toad. Nothing worse can happen to you for the rest of the day. They say money can't buy happiness. I would like the opportunity to find out. Why be serious?

Offline JOACH1M

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9813
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #27 on: October 02, 2011, 08:47:26 PM »
About as even as it can get IMO, the typh is a crap altitude planes a5's should pound them while the g6's have there handful with spit9's  :)
FEW ~ BK's ~ AoM
Focke Wulf Me / Last Of The GOATS 🐐
ToC 2013 & 2017 Champ
R.I.P My Brothers <3

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #28 on: October 02, 2011, 08:49:33 PM »
bite me shane. true the real interesting fights are going to be 12-20k, but i know what typically happens in these special events, the alt limits get pushed as far as they can and at 25k the ah version of the 109g6 starts wallowing like a pig in mud where the spit9 is turning into a thoroughbred. anyone who has spent any real time in ah spits knows it too.


no offense brooke the cm's do a great job putting events together and i realize it's as even as can be had within ah, but real life 109 pilots were also known to turn tail and run before a fight could occur when they believed they could not win.

So building in an edge for the 109 pilots is the only way they'll play?  Did you read the write up at all?  If flying at the top alt limit is all you've got in mind, you are going to miss most of the fight.

In an ideal world, we'd have a Spitfire LFIX since that's what the 11 Group Spits were flying in 43 as the fights were in the 15-25K range and the LFIX performed best.  We'd also have the Spit XII and Spit VII to fly escort and high cover.  But we don't so going with the FIX was appropriate and since the G6 appears to be the main 109 of the time.....
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15718
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Next scenario, Enemy Coast Ahead, RAF vs. LW
« Reply #29 on: October 02, 2011, 10:56:13 PM »
Folks, we talked it over and put in the following changes.

-- Two 109 groups can fly g-6's or g-2's, whichever they prefer.  It is not unreasonable to think that there were at least some g-2's still around.
-- Downwind was moved to 24k.  Originally, we had thought 25k is about right, but the arena allows winds only at 2k increments.  We initially picked 26k, but 24k is just as good historically.