All,
I know that you have heard this whine before. So, keep your shirt or skirt on and let me speak my piece. The La-7 should undoubtedly be perked. The only reason I didn't add this to a previous thread is because I didn't look a hard enough to find one. If the La-7 can out fly and out gun the Spitfire XIV, perk the La-7 or unperk the Spit XIV. We are talking about usual everyday LW MA flying as well. The La-7s short service record was clearly due to its unreliable engine and other general unservicability. Yet, it is one of the most powerful planes in the game. Not to mention its current popularity amongst players. How popular you ask, well let's see;
Plane Name Kills Deaths Kill/Death Ratio
Spitfire Mk XVI
2389 2252 1.06 La-7
3027 2215 1.37 Wow, as popular as or more than a Spit XVI

. Okay, let's take two popular perk rides and see how their doing this month;
Plane Name Kills Deaths Kill/Death Ratio
F4U-4
521 183 2.83 Tempest
454 74 6.05 Keeping in mind the units above made a more substantial contibution to winning the war for the allies, which the La-7 did not. How is the Spitfire XIV doing this month;
Plane Name Kills Deaths Kill/Death Ratio
Spitfire Mk XIV
130 128 1.01 Especially seeing that the Spit XIV was a V1 chaser and not really a dogfighter like the VIII and IX. I digress, with the La-7s currently rated performance and statistics in the MA, it should be perked. If it is not to be perked, then the Spitfire XIV should loose its perk and be given to the Spitfire XVI. "Wonder planes should have a wonderful little perk on them". Closing comments; perk a plane that really deserves the respect of a perk.
"Perk the La-7"...This has been a public service announcement....
My bottle of Merlot is now empty.
