See Rule #11

[alpini13]

  Thanks for all the support for changing the fw-190 a-8 we have in the game.  according to offical document for a fw-190 a-8 with 4 x 20mm and 2 x .50(13.1mm) with full feul load the official focke wulf documented weight is 4400KG...that is 9680 lbs...the same package in the game weighs  9675lbs...ABOUT THE SAME CORRECT WEIGHT.....the problem is the engine performance  we currently get up to 1.58 ata boost and it should be 1.65 ata boost according to official document for all fw-190 a-8 after july 1944. this would give better climb and lower alt perfomance...up to 20000ft.....there is however another fw 190 with better climb rate and speed,more amour and the same heavy gun package...made in quantity(about 900) made in series production,saw combat and had kills....the fw-190 A-9 with a weight of 4470KG(9834 lbs) with the same fuel load out and gun package as above. with more power it is faster than the a-8 and climbs better......the link to the info is on an earlier page in the previous 190 a-8 thread, and shows about 10 documents for the a-8. the documented weight and power loadout and performance documnet is in the new TA-152 development book that is currently out it shows info and performance for the 190 a-8, 190,a-9,190 d-9,190 d-12,ta-152 c and ta 152 h  

[B4Buster]

Do all your topic subjects need to be in bold?

[gyrene81]

where is the recording or video of kurt tank telling us the exact specifications? you are making that claim in your title...

[Wiley]

Cool!  Is the one ingame the post-July 1944 model?

Wiley.

[Plazus]

...  

Where in the hell are your paragraphs? I want to see proper grammar. I also do not see any capitalization in the beginning of your sentences. Your run-on sentences make my head hurt. Commas, apostrophes, and correct spelling is an absolute must if you want your thread to be taken seriously.

Your post makes a bold claim, but provides no factual evidence to support it.

Time to put the troll gloves back on.

Sincerely,
Plazus - Grammar Nazi

[Shuffler]

This is what is referred to as spamming the boards.

I would agree the TA 152 should be removed from game as it played little part in the war.



Thanks for all your support on being honest in game.

[Ardy123]

This is what is referred to as spamming the boards.

I would agree the TA 152 should be removed from game as it played little part in the war.



Thanks for all your support on being honest in game.

I believe the TA-152 we have trys to 'fill the gap' between the many 190 models past the d-9 (such as the d-13)  but don't quote me on it (I haven't researched it much).

[Babalonian]

Which A-8 variant are you specificaly referencing to, please? 

And an A-9 and D-11 would awesome, so would an A-7 though too...  Ah heck, why not throw a F-3, F-9, D-13, and even a G-3 if somoene is feeling vigerous enough to arrange the multitude of armament loadouts and defencive armor combinations (6x20mm gun boat... err, barge ).

[Wiley]

Which A-8 variant are you specificaly referencing to, please? 

And an A-9 and D-11 would awesome, so would an A-7 though too...  Ah heck, why not throw a F-3, F-9, D-13, and even a G-3 if somoene is feeling vigerous enough to arrange the multitude of armament loadouts and defencive armor combinations (6x20mm gun boat... err, barge ).

6... 20mms?

You'd need a stick of dynamite to get me out of the cockpit.

Wiley.

[B4Buster]

I feel as though all 190 variants should be removed from the game as they are clearly inferior to American aircraft (particularly the P-38). 

[Babalonian]

6... 20mms?

You'd need a stick of dynamite to get me out of the cockpit.

Wiley.

I think it was the Fw190 G-3/R3 that had the gun pods on the wings for strafing and buff hunting, adding 4 to the already standard 2 in the wingroots.  They stripped them though of a bit of the extra armor that came standard in the G-3 (also, the G-3 standard was no cowl MG 17s - in place was additional armor and an additional oil tank for longer engine run times) for those 6-canon birds, and given the logic with the A-8/R8 that we have in the game, where they added armor for the duty of buff interception, I would assume that meant it was almost necessary on the G-3/R with the gunpods in order to be able to perform their operations (although that might just be for the buff hunters at high alts and such).  I'd image with that loadout, it would be a bit of a dog, albeit one with some teeth.

[alpini13]

  lol you guys are hilarious. first, as this is not school, i refuse to have proper grammar,capitalization,paragraph structure etc unless i am being graded on it and if i am bad at it i need to be kept after school by a very hot brunette 40-22-36  teacher.   yes i like capital letters in my title,it kind of soothes me.  and as for a video of kurt tank. spme people must be confused, there was NO video in ww2....kurt tank did order the official study to be made,checked with the testing and actually flew some of the aircraft in question, and then summerized the results to the LUFT high command. if you get the new excellent book on the TA-152 and actually read it you will see what i mean...if you can read that is.   otherwise there are a few sourses that can verify these facts....adolf galland in one of his books that was published after the war actually quates what kurt tank said about this subject.   would a highly decorated LUFT pilot of gallands caliber really lie about this?  well considering he had nothing to lose and there was no internet or internet games in exsistance..i think not, at least there is evidence to support my claims  in little items know as the official focke wulf company testing documents.  as for a specific model to add...well the fw-190 a8 need a performance upgrade....add the fw-190 A-9   and while we are on the subject add a two drop tank option to the a-5 or add the a-6 or a G model 190...they would all do the same thing...but just add two drop tanks to a-5 would do the same without adding a new model a-6 or G

[gyrene81]

and as for a video of kurt tank. spme people must be confused, there was NO video in ww2....

there was NO video in ww2?    then something is amiss batman...

1933...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q-6H4xOUrs

maybe they got rid of the video cameras after that...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tUzwG4T6Ac

color even...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19X0qaChKx8&feature=related

and you did claim "from the mouth of kurt tank"...not even a copy of what he said??? 

[RTHolmes]

... i refuse to have proper grammar,capitalization,paragraph structure etc ...

and thats why your post reads like this:

blah blah blah blah blah. blah, as blah is blah blah, i blah to blah blah blah,blah,blah blah blah blah i am blah blah on it blah if i am blah at it i blah to be blah blah blah by a blah blah blah 40-22-36  blah.   blah i blah blah blah in my blah,it blah of blah me.  blah as blah a blah of blah blah. blah blah blah be blah, blah blah NO blah in ww2....blah blah blah blah blah blah blah to be blah,blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah of blah blah in blah, blah blah blah blah blah to blah LUFT blah blah. if blah blah blah blah blah blah on blah TA-152 blah blah blah it blah blah blah blah i blah...if blah blah blah blah is.   blah blah blah a blah blah blah blah blah blah blah....blah blah in blah of blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.   blah a blah blah LUFT blah of blah blah blah blah blah blah?  blah blah he blah blah to blah blah blah blah no blah or blah blah in blah..i blah blah, at blah blah is blah to blah my blah  in blah blah blah as blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.  as blah a blah blah to blah...blah blah fw-190 a8 blah a blah blah....blah blah fw-190 A-9   blah blah we blah on blah blah blah a blah blah blah blah to blah a-5 or blah blah a-6 or a G blah 190...blah blah blah do blah blah blah...blah blah blah blah blah blah to a-5 blah do blah blah blah blah a blah blah a-6 or G

[Ruah]

  lol you guys are hilarious. first, as this is not school, i refuse to have proper grammar,capitalization,paragraph structure etc unless i am being graded on it

You are by this community, and you have failed judging by how the post has gone.

Treat me and others with some modicum of respect by at last trying to use what is probably the only language you speak/read/write and put some effort into communicating to us, in a clear and concise way, what you are trying to say.  By doing so, you not only sound more convincing (a plus when you are arguing something) but also more intelligent (also a big plus).

There are people here who actually struggle with writing in general but they try, they re-read their posts, and they make an effort.  You have done none of these things and instead have become defensive.  Way to win respect.