Funny, now that I think about it, I realize that I have not flown a single LW aircraft since the rumble.
I am apparently one of those non-dedicated guys that cost the Luftwaffe, er, I mean "Axis", the Rumble.
I mean, heaven forbid that I should feel sorry for the fact that they were having difficulty attracting volunteers. I volunteered and actually showed up. I know I'm not particularly good in LW aircraft, but I did what I could.
You won't find me making that mistake again. I don't much care for being a scapegoat.
I fly many different aircraft, does that mean that I should be insulted? To be considered "valid" do I need to fly LW or RAF or FAA or USAAF or USN or VVS or RA or IJA or IJN exclusively?
Hardly flying, and poorly at that, I have one or more kills in these aircraft this tour:
A6M5b
F6F-5
Fw190D-9
Ki-61
Lancaster Mk III
Spitfire F.Mk IX
In addition, I have died in the following aircraft without obtaining a single kill:
Bf109G-10
C.202
Fw190A-5
Il-2
Ju88A-4
N1K2-J
P-47D-25
Panzer IV H
Spitfire Mk Vb
Why is it becoming so common to blast others? "You don't fly correctly because you use turn fighters!" "You don't play correctly because you use aircraft from all sorts of origins!"
Nothing so needs reforming as other peoples habits.-Mark TwainMy personaly feeling is that many of those vocal backers of LW aircraft that have left did so because they expect to effortlessly wipe out the unclean masses of non-LW aircraft that they perceive as having been grossly inferior.
I personally do not find the LW aircraft in AH to be dramatically more difficult to use, though most of them are somewhat more difficult. The Fw190D-9 is pretty easy though. I do not subscribe to the belief that German aircraft were superior across the board.
My best bomber mission for killing fighters was accomplished in a Ju88A-4, getting two N1K2-Js, one La-7 and one Fw190 (type unknown).