Venting

[MK-84]

So far you've stated:
I was picking
I probably was sitting with a bunch of supplies
I wasn't trying to take the base
you've also suggested that I was purposely trying to take advantage of the system


And you were not there as a witness to any of it.  Do you really need to make up reasons why I have to be wrong?

[guncrasher]

No what I'm saying is that neither of you is wrong.  You fought with whatever was available to both of you and allowed by the game.  Was it frustrating for you, yes I totally agree with you it totally sucks.   But there's nothing wrong with what he did as he took as much advantage of the situation as you did.

Semp

[des506]

look at our own collision model as it is... neither party is wrong... its just the way the system works... doesn't matter what your intentions were at all... i really dun blame you for feeling the way you do.,.. it sucks... but likewise i dun blame the guy who did it... cos it was saving him his own perks, or score, or trying to run your ammo dry... or even saving his own base... in the collision discussion they say just dun try to fly into each other... so i'm saying... drive closer and use that 88s to close down and get a kill with 1 shot... there... your problem is solved....

[Daddkev]

  What is one of those " Tankie Thingys"? Does it fly?

[guncrasher]

What is one of those " Tankie Thingys"? Does it fly?

not with the new transmission.  should've seen them fly downhill 6 months ago.


semp

[PAKFRONT]

Wirbel towering out under my bombs used to really hack me off. It's like they take the cheap shots at ya, then chicken out.
I think that it's OK when being attacked by Lankstuka, Fortstuka, or Libstukas.. (Hmm, I suppose we'll have Nookstukas now with the 29 huh?)
But if you are being attacked by a single Dive Bombing plane, 1v1 and you tower out under his bombs? One of the weakest showings in the game!
Pathetic!

[Dead Man Flying]

The guy at his base was griefing you within the game's limits.  He was trying to get under your skin, and he succeeded.  This thread is proof.

[Tyrannis]

Aceshigh:

Where HO'ing somone is a distasteful move, But towering to avoid a tank round isent.

[Karnak]

(Hmm, I suppose we'll have Nookstukas now with the 29 huh?)

Only from people who want to throw away their bomber perks.

[Butcher]

Aceshigh:

Where HO'ing somone is a distasteful move, But towering to avoid a tank round isent.

It depends, if you kill someone 2-3 times and they bring back bomb's because they can't tank - towering out is acceptable.

You might even get a squad named after you for doing it.

[FireDrgn]

Dood ,  I totally would have done what you did but at the same time, I would have done what he did.   There is no fault in what either of you did.  You play in a way which gives you the most advantage.

It's not the same as getting ho'd or rammed.  It really sucks, I totally agree with you, but he took advantage of his position just like you did.

Semp

of course its no fault its amoral...  but the game dynamics make it un balanced game play. a game is implied to be balanced.  if it was balanced the attacker should have a safe instant disapear get a new tank re apear option...