Question for VBrigade guys

[Rob52240]

The game has all sorts of situations you can win in!

You can win the "war," and reset the map.
You can win a dogfight.
You can win a base.
You can win a tank battle.

All of these flip-side into failures as well.  Just because you can't "beat the game" doesn't mean that there is no winning or losing.  If there was no competition, why would you play?

WRONG!!!  I get a score of 14.99 every month!!!  I probably have the most consistent score in the game.

[guncrasher]

The game has all sorts of situations you can win in!

You can win the "war," and reset the map.
You can win a dogfight.
You can win a base.
You can win a tank battle.

All of these flip-side into failures as well.  Just because you can't "beat the game" doesn't mean that there is no winning or losing.  If there was no competition, why would you play?

win exactly what.

Semp

[The Fugitive]

The game has all sorts of situations you can win in!

You can win the "war," and reset the map.
You can win a dogfight.
You can win a base.
You can win a tank battle.

All of these flip-side into failures as well.  Just because you can't "beat the game" doesn't mean that there is no winning or losing.  If there was no competition, why would you play?

win exactly what.

Semp

I think he spelled it out pretty well. With those "wins" there must be the ability to lose as well.
 
Player hordes have removed the chance, almost completely of not capturing the base winning a dog fight (gang), winning a GV battle (dive bombing lancs), and of course this means they roll on through the "win the war" scenario as well. If that is the case, why bother? Might as well just have every one log one and one night a week one team get a capture for the other teams automatically every 5 minutes. This way they can win the war each night and get their perks and don't even have to fly. Sounds like fun !

[JUGgler]

oh man juggler i was just being sarcastic  .  was just making fun of the idea that only 8 people are needed to take a base.  both are doable but highly improbable  as if 2 or 3 defenders up the base take has a high chance of a fail.

there's times when a base can be taken with just a handful of people and there are others when you can bring 100 and you wont take the base.  it all depends on how much the enemy wants to defend the base.


semp

My bad


 

[Ardy123]

Player hordes have removed the chance, almost completely of not capturing the base winning a dog fight (gang), winning a GV battle (dive bombing lancs), and of course this means they roll on through the "win the war" scenario as well.

Its simpler that that... They (all horde squads) are a bunch of pvssies who are afraid of taking any risk of cartoon death but want to feel the 'high' of winning. They just haven't figured out that the 'high' is much better when you've invested some effort & taken risk.

Time to quit drinking the wine coolers kiddo, and move to whiskey.

[Coronado]

Not necessarily.  I see the vguys just being "efficient".  There is no incentive to stick around to defend a base that defends itself the instant you capture it.

Easy to be efficient when you have the other country out numbered by 30/40 and you have that many in a mission. (just my 2c)

[Rob52240]

Easy to be efficient when you have the other country out numbered by 30/40 and you have that many in a mission. (just my 2c)

The enemy of my enemy is not my friend, but he may not be messing with me so much while I'm attacking the other enemy sometimes.

[Coronado]

Not necessarily.  I see the vguys just being "efficient".  There is no incentive to stick around to defend a base that defends itself the instant you capture it.

Easy to be efficient when you have the other country out numbered by 30/40 and you have that many in a mission. (just my 2c)

[guncrasher]

My bad


 

 

semp