Author Topic: Good 210/410 linkage  (Read 1066 times)

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Good 210/410 linkage
« on: January 21, 2012, 08:54:43 PM »
Spanish-language forum, but a variety of bits and pieces, some of which I'd not seen before:

http://www.1y2gm.com/t3177-messerschmitt-me-210-410
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline tmetal

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2012, 11:44:27 AM »
Some interesting pictures in there. I like the one showing the cable and pully system used to hoist bombs into the bomb bay.
The real problem is anyone should feel like they can come to this forum and make a wish without being treated in a derogatory manner.  The only discussion should be centered around whether it would work, or how it would work and so on always in a respectful manner.

-Skuzzy 5/18/17

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2012, 12:27:20 PM »
That one's been shown in other references, but some of the others are more rare. Interesting find.  :aok

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2012, 05:47:09 PM »
Wow. 210 was a hunk of Junk.   :huh
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2012, 06:46:13 PM »
Not so much, really. The fight was really an administrators and an engineer's battle. The pilots wanted them. They had better performance than the 110Cs they were replacing. They were being field tested in 1940, even. Can you imagine the impact they would have had on early war planes with their performance? The 210C lengthened the tail and added leading edge slats and remedied most of the problems already.

The rest was political bickering, in-fighting, and bureaucratic saber rattling.

Although... Willi Messerschmitt should really know how to design a set of landing gear and brakes by then. THAT was truly inexcusable. More planes lost due to failing gear or no brakes than in combat, I'd wager!

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2012, 12:24:32 AM »
Some interesting pictures in there. I like the one showing the cable and pully system used to hoist bombs into the bomb bay.

I was hinkin of the same thing.  How many 210 did japs get?
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2012, 09:27:15 AM »
Just a few (2-3) examples, I think.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2012, 10:37:56 AM »
Really cool find thank you for sharing! I did enjoy the photos of different bomb/gun/rocket configuration

Krusty a question for ya:
There's a photo of an experimental skin for the Me210 for the Hungarians - do you think it could be added in game?
JG 52

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2012, 11:20:14 AM »

Krusty a question for ya:
There's a photo of an experimental skin for the Me210 for the Hungarians - do you think it could be added in game?
(Image removed from quote.)

There was a disucsion about that in December.  Most likly it can be added.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2012, 11:28:43 AM »
There was a disucsion about that in December.  Most likly it can be added.

Well the reason I ask (because I am not a skinner or know the rules) but It was an experimental skin - would that be allowed?

I know the 210 skins can be added, but wasn't sure about experimental skins, this one just seems really nice.
JG 52

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2012, 11:58:17 AM »
Well there's different kinds of experimental... In this case it means a nonstandard camo. There were far more experiemental ones (i.e. prototypes, experiments, test planes, etc) that are not valid. However this was a combat camo patter that falls into the category of custom-mottling on Luftwaffe planes.

So based on that alone, yes it's valid. The question is whether HTC will accept a very similar 210Ca on the 410. They were very similar and the 210Ca was powered with slightly less powerful engines. I will definitely try to get that specific skin into the game.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Good 210/410 linkage
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2012, 12:51:26 PM »
Thanks for the info Krusty it was quite helpful.
JG 52