What is wrong with a cannon 51 Really?
I won't be flying it much but history shows it was there and was used in quantity.
What are your real objections that relate to the facts of this plane?
You want more info, more pics, what? Ill be happy too.
...
So stop calling me names and trying to be little me you look stupid.
You're the one that looks stupid. You're flat our wrong. Everyone (not just "a few) knows how you are wrong and you fail to "get it" over and over. You're the one looking stupid.
"history shows it was there and was
used in quantity."
I've bolded where you are flat out wrong.
"What are your real objections that relate to the facts of this plane?
You want more info, more pics, what? Ill be happy too."
Wrong. You're posting info about mixed squadrons flying multiple planes, and showing pictures of A-36s, NOT cannon-armed Mustangs. You're posting info for plane A and saying it's plane B. Not one single thing you've posted is new info, but you're geting it so mixed up you think it's evidence to help you.
It's not.
You're posting evidence of the A-36 to support your claims of the widespread use of the Mustang. If you still refuse to understand, you are hopeless and your education must be hampered by some kind of syndrome or something. Seriously. For the last time:
The A-36 is not the same as the Mustang!