So, basically, if there is a scenario that lacks a certain plane that we do not have an appropriate substitute for, that side should do without a plane to fill that role? Not arguing, just trying to get on the same page here.
Like I said, it's not ideal, but that's the way to go. Adjusting scenario rules, planeset, or even the setting to accomodate the planes we have seems to have yielded equal parts success and discontent.
I think some subs work, some don't.
My opinion, at least.
