You keep mentioning this "uparmoring" over and over again while you aren't able to produce any proof that there is any on AH's 190A-8. There certainly is more proof available that the armor what the 190A-8 had in standard fighter config.
Could you explain what this particular "AH term" means?
Your first quote is quite confusing in the English language, no offence intended, but please rephrase. I'll try to attempt to respond to it accuratley:
Proof is in the E6B, the weight is right there. Otherwise and beyond that, only HiTech or employees of HTCs have access or knowledge to accurate aplications/modeling/presence of armor and toughness values of individual AH airframe components or AH aircraft as a whole. What you ask to proove is impossible of anyone short of those with this access, and neither you or me have any authority or influence over the resource/attention given it. From what I see, what is available, and what is demonstrated through actual use of the aircraft in AH - I will claim that it's there. Want proof to validate or dismiss my claim, contact HTCs.
What is your proof of a "
standard 190A-8 fighter" configuration? I'll go ahead and skip ahead to why I'm so confused by this particular comment - from all I've dug through, there is none, so please show me, I am very eager.
What we do have are earlier pre 190A-8/R2s,R8s (A7s definetley, I think even some A6s but will need to verify) in standard production fighter configurations then getting the standard upgrade packages (field kits/power eggs) to bring them up-to-date or futher in-line with current standards. Then we have these new/later production standards/vareints/line of A8s were geared for creating the latest/later bomber-interceptors. These are the ones that had that reinforced armor in the wings, compared to the ones that didn't...... perhaps to best get to my point at how prevolant I think this clearly was - How many new A-8s were produced from sept/oct of '44 until the end, and how many total A-8s were there? Where is any example to be found of the 700 a7s produced from the end of '43 to the spring of '44 after that time (April '44)? So what the heck are those 190s flying in April'44-Sept'45, or weren't there any at all durign this time?...
I apologise, I threw some stinky bait out on a line with the reference to the Finn Brew... but since it hooked you, might as well reel it in - An "AH Finnish Brewster" is as it sat on a runway in Finnland during roughly the late-summer of 1945 - as opposed to one de-crated on a Finnish Dock, or any example to be found prior to a date of or after the end of all hostilities. I want an "AH Finnish A8" too.
Clear?
(And to be honestly clear - just because it happened with ONE ac in AH, doesn't justify expecting it to happen for other ac, including the 190. I like the AH Finn Brew, but I was trolling you, so unless there is some further point we both would rather persue over it, Ill drop it.)
And AGAIN, I'll reitterate, nothing is criticly off or wrong with our A-8 - I just wish we had one that wasn't such a dog, and they did exist, just not in any standard or production varient, and thus they're probabley just better to be left out... as cool as an A-6 with 6/4/2x20mm, no cowl guns, and the powerplant of an A-9 would be - it's also breaking at least every other rule HTCs has for including an ac in the game.
Edit: I'm no english major either.