Author Topic: Kursk next?  (Read 4402 times)

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2012, 04:52:44 PM »
fnord

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2012, 05:31:06 PM »
Hmmm... Do we have the terrain?  ;)
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2012, 05:42:18 PM »
Hmmm... Do we have the terrain?  ;)

Not exactly, but I figure that any number of current terrains could be pressed into service for it -- Tunisia, etc., perhaps.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2012, 05:55:08 PM »
Keep in mind that M3s with the gun on it can act as stationary AT guns.... About as defenseless as them. Just set them up ahead of time and don't let them move around.

My only issue with this is that the M3 gun is less powerfull than some of the soviet AT weapons used at Kursk, and since AT guns could move (just not fire on the move), we should allow them to relocate if they're being over run. In that case, we open the door to 65mph flank attacks by the Soviets.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline SEseph

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2012, 06:25:00 PM »
Not exactly, but I figure that any number of current terrains could be pressed into service for it -- Tunisia, etc., perhaps.

It's been a while since we had a good desert campaign.  :aok

I have the PERFECT skin. Leopard print is back!  :D
BOWL Axis CO 2014 BoB13 JG52 XO DSG2 Axis S. Cmdr 2012 WSDG Allied CO 2012 Multiple GL/XO Side/Section CO/XO since early '00s
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W.C.Fields

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4679
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2012, 06:37:51 PM »
Hmmm... Do we have the terrain?  ;)

I trys and trys to teach them the order for proper planning...
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2012, 06:39:17 PM »
Quote
Leopard print is back!  Big Grin

No, it isn't, now please step away from the unitard....
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2012, 07:03:26 PM »
You guys ruin everything! I swear the Battle for Seattle was my next FSO...
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline TomD

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #23 on: May 15, 2012, 08:58:10 PM »
In the alternate history of my imagining, it would be to make sure Hoosiers are kept out.  :P

 :salute   

Screaming Eagles
SEdodger

Offline HighTone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
      • Squad Site
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2012, 10:25:40 AM »
Before I design another ground war, in fact before we run another ground war I will require 30 written pledges of participation per side promising their 401ks, first born, and the removal of their pinky fingers if they fail to sign up and attend.

Btw, the new black sea map has an area designed specificity for a recreation of Kursk.

I would love to do more GV events, I highly enjoyed DoB in tanks, but we need GVers to commit to participate.. not force people who want to fly to GV.

Cheers,

Fencer

Good luck with that. Unless you have a ground war centered around a spawn camp I doubt the "GVers" would show.

Spawn shoot die, spawn shoot die...out of lives, frame over,

LCA Special Events CO     LCA ~Tainan Kokutai~       
www.lcasquadron.org      Thanks for the Oscar HTC

Offline SEseph

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2012, 02:48:05 PM »
Good luck with that. Unless you have a ground war centered around a spawn camp I doubt the "GVers" would show.

Spawn shoot die, spawn shoot die...out of lives, frame over,

That was basically what we just did. GVer's, contrary to popular belief, like tactics. When you have one or two points into a single target, people know where you are going, so it will eventually turn into a slug fest. If there were multiple targets with varying entry routes and tactics played a much much larger part, you'll see many GVers want to participate.

The idea wasn't bad, it was the numbers when broken down and the forced participation in GV's that gave this time a sour taste. But there in lies the problem... Unless there are enough people, we can never try to achieve the Golden Age of GV's in Scenarios.
BOWL Axis CO 2014 BoB13 JG52 XO DSG2 Axis S. Cmdr 2012 WSDG Allied CO 2012 Multiple GL/XO Side/Section CO/XO since early '00s
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W.C.Fields

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2012, 04:11:51 PM »
Good luck with that. Unless you have a ground war centered around a spawn camp I doubt the "GVers" would show.

Spawn shoot die, spawn shoot die...out of lives, frame over,


Says the guy who has a total of 2 GV kills for the past 5 tours.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2012, 05:40:53 PM »
Kursk again, already?  I'm STILL waiting for another BoB.... once upon a time, it used to be run every year or two.
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4679
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2012, 05:50:26 PM »
BoB will be happily be reran once we get the He111.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Kursk next?
« Reply #29 on: May 17, 2012, 06:00:05 PM »

Says the guy who has a total of 2 GV kills for the past 5 tours.

With the crickets chirping from the GV slots in the last scenario, I'd be hard pressed to believe you could get enough for it to matter.  A dedicated GV war was involved and I think we had 4 total folks sign up for GVs and ended up having the fliers have to drive tanks even if they didn't care to.

Very noble of you to volunteer for leading Panthers :)

Get yourself a bunch of Sherman 75 drivers and volunteer for that instead :aok
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters