Author Topic: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question  (Read 978 times)

Offline alpini13

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« on: June 07, 2012, 06:19:22 PM »
  I thought it was a good post.  the question is which sides  do each country have........it should be    GERMAN,ITALIAN,JAPAN      vs   ENGLAND,RUSSIA   vs   AMERICAN            WHY?   each would have good air, good ground, and cv aircraft....althought the   english side would still need some developement and so some stand ins would be needed for it to work.     each month the aircraft and gv gruops would rotate and so in a three month period you would have the opportunity to use all the aircraft and vehicles.   your squad could stay on same country...or move each month if they like to fly certain rides      if smaller nations aircraft were added,thier plane set would go into one of the three groups........like maybe france,finland or china to americans.   something like that.   and so......  add the glouster meteor,sea hurricane,seafire 3,ju-52,he-177   and we can REALLY have some fun

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23949
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2012, 06:27:46 PM »
it should be    GERMAN,ITALIAN,JAPAN      vs   ENGLAND,RUSSIA   vs   AMERICAN            WHY?   each would have good air, good ground, and cv aircraft...


Really?

Let's look at the Cv's..


Axis
A6M (2,3,5)
B5N
D3A

vs

Allies
F4U-1
F4U-1a
F4U-1D
F4U-C
F4U-4
F6F
TBM
SBD
Seafire


The axis would simply wiped off the seas without any doubt. particularly if you keep in mind the bomber disparity too:

Ar 234
Ju 88
G4M
Ki-67

vs

B-17
B-24
B-26
B-29
Lancaster



It's almost the definition of unbalanced.

That's why Axis vs Allies setup do work only in special events, with a careful and elaborated setup of additional rules and victory conditions, strictly governed by referees. In the everything goes MA with thousands of player, it simply does not work.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2012, 06:44:41 PM »
You forgot the F4F.

Never under-estimate the F4F.

 :mad:


See Rule #4

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23949
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2012, 06:46:33 PM »
 Just FYI. I looked up the usage data (K+D) for Axis & Allied planes in the MA in all of 2011. The ratio was 7-3. And that was in a a blanced environment...

So with the info provided above, you can imagine what side the player would gravitate to. And this migration would speed up the more imbalanced the numbers are getting.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 06:48:21 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2012, 06:50:48 PM »
Not only is there an unbalance in the aircraft for each side, the other suggestion of a rolling plane set isn't a way to attract new players.  Players will not play if they are forced to fly something other than what they wish, nor would players wait a month or three to be able to fly the ride of their choice. 

Ask yourself this, if a rolling plane set is such a good idea, why didn't HiTech carry over that feature to AH from Warbirds? 

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8100
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2012, 06:54:18 PM »
Just FYI. I looked up the usage data (K+D) for Axis & Allied planes in the MA in all of 2011. The ratio was 7-3. And that was in a a blanced environment...

You've got that reversed, right?  7 allied-3 axis?

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23949
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2012, 06:55:15 PM »
You've got that reversed, right?  7 allied-3 axis?

Wiley.

errr, yes.  :o

7 allies 3 axis
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8100
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2012, 07:30:24 PM »
No offense intended. :). It's just that sometimes the numbers show womething other than what I am expecting, and I found that counterintuitive.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2012, 08:01:24 PM »
The Axis side wouldn't be so unbalanced for bombers if planes like the DO-17, HE-111, and DO-177 where added
The nation rotation could if there where 3 rooms set up (so if you wanted to fly american you would go to room 1, british/russian room 2, axis room 3)
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23949
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2012, 08:02:46 PM »
The Axis side wouldn't be so unbalanced for bombers if planes like the DO-17, HE-111,

You are joking... pls tell me you are joking.

The Do-17 balancing the B-29 or B-17?
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2012, 08:17:47 PM »
I'm no saying it would be perfect.....
Just make things a little better
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight

Offline Hazard69

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 748
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2012, 05:51:17 AM »
You are joking... pls tell me you are joking.

The Do-17 balancing the B-29 or B-17?

Hmm, would it balanced if the axis had formations and the allies did not?

Problem is, that in the war, the two sides had completely different needs, and different solutions to meet those needs.

Problem with bringing that to MA is: we dont have the different needs, and solution from all three sides are always the same:
Get the cheapest bomber with the biggest bombload and go suicide dive it into whatever u want to kill or bomb and bail. Lancs/B24s/B17s usually fall into this category. How many even try to make it back after dropping their ords?

How often do we see Ki67s, bettys, the bostons or event the B25s used?
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 05:54:32 AM by Hazard69 »
<S> Hazardus

The loveliest thing of which one could sing, this side of the Heavenly Gates,
Is no blonde or brunette from a Hollywood set, but an escort of P38s.

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2012, 06:10:59 AM »


Problem with bringing that to MA is: we dont have the different needs, and solution from all three sides are always the same



And THAT'S why the Axis V Allies arena is so awesome.


 :salute

See Rule #4

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7310
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2012, 07:55:58 AM »
Except that it's more of a special events arena than a true axis vs allies.

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: assigned sides for the battlefield evolution question
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2012, 08:13:19 AM »


How often do we see Ki67s, bettys, the bostons or event the B25s used?

Thats kinda the point of this whole thing is to make them more usefull
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight