Author Topic: Me-4210 versus P-61  (Read 4366 times)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #30 on: June 19, 2012, 08:59:54 PM »

It was actually a problem if your closing speed was too fast at night.


Hence why they had night vision.




Offline jag88

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 142
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #31 on: June 20, 2012, 02:10:33 AM »
Doubt it as I don't see a relation.  Adding the BK37 now doesn't save any work over adding it later.

I am glad to see three new guns, MK103, BK37 and BK5, in the next version.

Out of curiosity, is there anything else that used the BK5? (Not the test on the Me262).

Why stop there?  :D



410 Km/h max, 16 shells and only 23 built! Perk!  :rock





The German Sturmovik!  :P

Jokes aside, the Hs-129 did have a Mk103 option (100 shells), as well as a Bk 3,7 one (12 shells)...

...just like the Bf-110... with 60 shells for the latter... :noid
« Last Edit: June 20, 2012, 02:27:02 AM by jag88 »
The 88 in my name has nothing to do with nazis, skinheads or any other type of half-wit, nor with the "ideas" they support.

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #32 on: June 20, 2012, 02:30:29 AM »
Id like to see the P61  :aok
Absolutely. It would be a damn fun addition for sure.

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2012, 05:27:50 PM »
Hs 129 Party weeeeeeee.











bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.