Author Topic: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?  (Read 5233 times)

Offline Vinkman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« on: July 24, 2012, 12:54:47 AM »
So I spent most of the night Buff hunting in a 410 with the 50mm and observed two things: 

1) 50mm may be too good. 1 shot will kill any buff. I had a sortie tonight where I killed two groups of buffs flying together with 15 rounds. Every shot was from outside 1000 yrds. And the velocity is so high, and the trajectory so flat it's very easy to make 1000yrd shots. That was only my second sortie with the 50mm.

2) The pilot of the 410 is as fragile as an egg. 1 ping from 1500-1000 yards from the buff insta killed me 6-7 times tonight. I know the 410 has a lot of cockpit glass, but wasn't any of it bullet proof? I failed to get credit for about 7 buffs tonight that I blow the wing off of, only to be insta-killed before the buff crashed. (so don't get a kill recorded, but that's a different thread) 

It's like the 50mm is so good, they made the pilot extra easy to kill to give the buffs a chance. It must be frustrating for the buff pilots to have to face such a lethal weapon, and it's equally frustrating for the 410 pilots to be insta-killed by a single ping from 1500-1000yrds.

Perhaps the gun, and the frontal toughnes of the 410 could be tweeked to provide a bit more survivability for the both the 410 and the buffs.   :salute


 :salute
Who is John Galt?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2012, 01:30:00 AM »
Instant pilot kill from any aspect is seriously messed up. Should be more protected than that. Armored seat and headrest, aswell as an armored tub around the pilots -- I still found myself in the tower before I heard the ping from behind.

I managed to find a formation of bombers and popped 2 before he got out of the bombsight, and the first shot he fired I literally was back in the tower instantly -- no damage just instant tower. There should be forward armor somewhere on it. Doesn't appear to work.


Happens far too often, it seems.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2012, 01:45:51 AM »
I am not sure if airplanes had bullet proof glass back then.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2012, 02:06:16 AM »
I am not sure if airplanes had bullet proof glass back then.


semp
Most in AH have the front pane as bullet proof.

Historically, for example, Robert Stanford Tuck's Spitfire Mk II had the front pane replaced with bullet proof glass when he was covering the Dunkirk evacuation.  He took a 20mm round from a Bf110C in a headon the flight after it was added and would have died then and there had it not been added.

I do not know where the Me410 stands in that regard, but given its role, size and weight I'd be surprised if it weren't bullet proof in the front.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2012, 04:21:41 AM »
Buffs are going to need Fighter escort now :)

I thought 410 were meant to fetle Bombers.

This would add a new side to the game close cobat support from fighters. <S>

Sqaud members and friends will have to work together to defend bombers.

There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline Paladin3

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 331
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2012, 06:40:51 AM »
Nerfing things for "balance" turns a sim into an arcade game. I am not for it for the sake of balance. I am for making the game as much of a simulation as possible. If it is really that dangerous maybe it should be pushed up on the ENY scale. Personally I think the fewer used planes in the war that barely got out there should be much lower in numbers encountered.

Think of it as a good time to learn to escort buffs to get them to the target.

Just my two cents.

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2012, 06:47:55 AM »
+1
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2012, 08:00:43 AM »
I think the 50mm may be just what the Dr. ordered.

I hope this is an eye opener in that escort fighters are a GOOD thing.   :aok
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2012, 08:07:10 AM »
Or, when long range strat runs on the city are getting more popular in the future again, we will see a significant increase in B-29 usage for that   ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2012, 08:40:16 AM »
No tweaking necessary, the fact a bomber destroyer is actually becoming effective in that role is a good thing.

Besides, most bombers guys fly so high that they might as well fly offline. If you want to bring a Me410 to that altitude, you might as well be rewarded for it.
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline Vinkman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2012, 10:00:56 AM »
No tweaking necessary, the fact a bomber destroyer is actually becoming effective in that role is a good thing.

Besides, most bombers guys fly so high that they might as well fly offline. If you want to bring a Me410 to that altitude, you might as well be rewarded for it.

It is an tedious process. the 410 with 100% fuel and the 50mm climbs at a bout 1.95K/minute. In level flight on military power it cruises at about 320mph. So you need to fly it like bomber. Take two sectors from where you are headed, and climb to about 20k and circle on station. It's faster up high, with a top speed of 360 at 20K. (with the big gun in the front). So you can chase down formation given enough time. I think I chased some B-24s last night for 45 minutes.

The comment about escorts is spot on. After the first 2 hours of hunting, the buffs all had escorts.  Many of the escort planes were flown by buff pilots I had shot down previously that night. They had realized the threat and adjusted.

And the threat is very significant. I came across two formations of B-17s at 20K. I pulled up behind them at 1500 yrds and opened fire. I killed all six buffs with a total of 15 rounds fired. Later DejaVu and I were both climbing out in 410s when we spotted two groups of Lancs coming in NOE to the base we just took off from. We dove and killed 5 of the 6 on the first pass, the other one got evasive, mis-dropped his bombs and got killed by the auto ack.
Who is John Galt?

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7257
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2012, 10:15:14 AM »
From historical references, the BK 5 autocannon we have in Aces High is acurate. It is essentially a Panzer III cannon that was redesigned to fire a high velocity 50mm fragmentation shell. 

Trust me. If you take a 50mm shell in the tail of a B-17, the fragments will essentially shred everything right up to the nose gunner. 1 shot kills is not unrealsitic. This weapon took down 127 bombers during its limited use.

(reference: Stocker, Werner; Petrick, Peter (2007), Messerschmitt Me 210 / Me 410 Hornisse/ Hornet, Midland Publishing).
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Vinkman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2012, 10:26:33 AM »
From historical references, the BK 5 autocannon we have in Aces High is acurate. It is essentially a Panzer III cannon that was redesigned to fire a high velocity 50mm fragmentation shell.  

Trust me. If you take a 50mm shell in the tail of a B-17, the fragments will essentially shred everything right up to the nose gunner. 1 shot kills is not unrealsitic. This weapon took down 127 bombers during its limited use.

(reference: Stocker, Werner; Petrick, Peter (2007), Messerschmitt Me 210 / Me 410 Hornisse/ Hornet, Midland Publishing).

Question: The 410 ammo for the 50mm is not a choice, meaning I can't choose AP or HE. It kills tanks like an AP, and kills planes like an HE. Is it modelled as both to make it more effective? or did the actual round perform both roles?  :salute
« Last Edit: July 24, 2012, 10:43:26 AM by Vinkman »
Who is John Galt?

Offline Alpo

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1428
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2012, 10:30:31 AM »
From historical references, the BK 5 autocannon we have in Aces High is acurate. It is essentially a Panzer III cannon that was redesigned to fire a high velocity 50mm fragmentation shell. 

Trust me. If you take a 50mm shell in the tail of a B-17, the fragments will essentially shred everything right up to the nose gunner. 1 shot kills is not unrealsitic. This weapon took down 127 bombers during its limited use.

(reference: Stocker, Werner; Petrick, Peter (2007), Messerschmitt Me 210 / Me 410 Hornisse/ Hornet, Midland Publishing).


Please stop quoting references... this is the HTC forum.  Conjecture and whines... THAT is the stuff forums are made of!

 :aok

p.s.  Love floating around in a BK 5 packing 410 above Vbases which are under attack.  Low level buffs are sure to show up sooner or later  :devil
SkyKnights Fighter Group -CO-
R.I.P.  SKDenny 02/03/1940 - 02/19/2012

...

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2012, 10:40:15 AM »
I will fly as fighter escort at a small charge of $1.50 a hour :old:
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario