Author Topic: 410 wing - really?  (Read 1978 times)

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
410 wing - really?
« on: August 27, 2012, 10:42:26 PM »
Starboard wing keeps getting sawn off in no time flat. Seriously, were two metal spars really that weak?
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Midway

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4579
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2012, 11:19:23 PM »
I find the tail is easy to seperate fom the rest of the aeroplane.


    PARADISE ON EARTH  ------->  http://www.youtube.com/v/g_D4RhfCY2M&autoplay=1&hd=1&fs=1   <-------  PARADISE ON EARTH :)



Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2012, 11:41:08 PM »
The 410 is a prime example of why the player base should not get to vote on aircraft.
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2012, 11:42:52 PM »
The 410 is a prime example of why the player base should not get to vote on aircraft.

 I'm having fun in it :)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7282
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2012, 11:54:18 PM »
I was flying next to a lancaster at over D1200 and lost a wing with a single ping sound.

It wasn't from the rear .50 but rather a .30 caliber gun.

Offline Nath[BDP]

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2012, 11:57:56 PM »
The airframe does seem weak.  It should be tougher imo considering it handles like an overweight piggy.
++Blue Knights++
vocalist of the year


Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2012, 12:36:19 AM »
21,000 lbs of balsa
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2012, 01:13:16 AM »
Even the balsa parts of the Mossie strike me as more durable than the 410 wing.


Yes, a waaaaaah has been recorded.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2012, 02:18:34 AM »
meanwhile, an A20 is taking 30mm hits as breakfast  :angel:
now posting as SirNuke

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2012, 06:41:28 AM »
21,000 lbs of balsa

21000lbs of balsa would be virtually indestructible for anything but 18" cannons :)
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #10 on: August 28, 2012, 07:29:35 AM »
The 410 is a prime example of why the player base should not get to vote on aircraft.

This brings to mind two questions:

- is the 410 damage model functioning correctly as intended?

- which aircraft would HTC have chosen to model apart form community input?  (if the answer is He111 or Ki.43 or J2M I'm going to rend my t shirt)


Offline Fulcrum

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1183
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2012, 08:26:24 AM »
This brings to mind two questions:

- is the 410 damage model functioning correctly as intended?

- which aircraft would HTC have chosen to model apart form community input?  (if the answer is He111 or Ki.43 or J2M I'm going to rend my t shirt)



Why for J2M?   Been brought up / whined about too much?  :headscratch:
Going by "Hoplite" now. :)

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2012, 08:27:59 AM »
The airframe does seem weak.  It should be tougher imo considering it handles like an overweight piggy.

Waystin aint that fat...
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2012, 01:00:14 PM »
Why for J2M?   Been brought up / whined about too much?  :headscratch:

Just always had an interest in the J2M, and would like to see it in game some day.   The other two are great scenario planeset hole-fillers.    Not to be construed as a whine, just a playful poke at the wisdom of the masses vs HTC's possible choices.   But maybe they would've put in the Meteor, who can say?    :D   
 
I do like the community participation in choosing the next plane though.   Its a great way to make the players feel involved in the game's development, and if the a/c doesn't work out as its hoped or expected to, we've only ourselves to blame.  :frown:

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: 410 wing - really?
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2012, 09:54:15 PM »
I'm having fun in it :)

Shame on you... :old:

Snailman Tour 151 (Current)

Kills in:     51
Kills of:      7
Killed by:   2
Died in:     7