You are making another assumption. Thinking that any video you see broadcast by the media is the entire unedited video showing the entire situation. I have no confidence that the media is telling the truth, much less the entire story on any video or news "story" they publish. They have been caught too many times slanting, distorting or out right lying in their presentations. I've seen it in action too many times including places and situations where I was present.
so you mean the video of the soldier running down the hill was edited to mislead? where is your evidence since we dont really know where the original is kept?
and btw the only assumption I made was that 2 people can look at a video, any video, and reach different conclusions. for example smokinloon claim that rodney was throwing officers around "like rag dolls" which is an outright lie based on the fact that 2 officers tripped on each other. he also states that king didnt get hit on the head while I clearly see him getting hit many times with blows directly to the neck and head.
I am not trying to re-investigate the entire incident but more trying to prove that people look at things in a different way as in the case of that soldier running down the hill. people look at that video and some will see it as a fake and some others will see it as real based on whatever misconceptions they had. they reasons why it was a fake/not fake had been discussed to death. now a few months later the soldier comes forward and says the video is real. so it is real and that is that.
midway
