I just posted the link to the entire video. and also it is a lie that king was throwing officers around like rag dolls. also king throwing officers around like rag dolls would have been cause to use deadly force and it would have been proper. the court papers have been available for a long time so please post a link to a court document where the officers claim that king was throwing them around like rag dolls. btw this is a double dare. this has been proven a lie many times over.
there is always people who claim the entire video wasnt shown because they refuse to believe that the entire video was already shown. I saw the entire video then the shorten version where they cut off the beginning which is basically useless because they guy was trying to focus the camera. but please do keep claiming that you are the only one that has seen the entire video.
midway
I do not see a link posted by you. However, I did a search and I could not find the full version. As usual, people are posting the "full video" online and yes there is about 2:00 to 2:30 min cut out. The "full video" being shown begins where the officers go full samurai with their PR24's, and not the one officer being lifted up and bent backwards over the hood of the squad car. Mind you, I'm not defending the COPs, I simply saying that until the entire video is shown and the entire facts are laid out there is a lot to be left to drama. I'm not the only one to have seen the entire video, there were at least another 40-60 LEO's in the classes I attended on the use of force that watched it. It is out there somewhere on the interwebs, I'll keep searching. You do the same and let us all know when you find it.
Also, King physically engaging the officers via "hands on" is NOT a cause to use deadly force, especially with that number of officers present. I'm willing to bet that CA's "Use of Force" laws mention an end game something to the effect of "... lethal force used by another reasonable and prudent person or persons under the same circumstance", and/or "... if the individual feels their own life or the life of another is in imminent danger". There is no action in specific that automatically dictate the use of lethal force. If severely disabled G'ma is sitting in her wheel chair with a loaded 12 ga shotgun across her lap and she cant even lift the gun up, does that constitute lethal force? Does a 110 lb naked hood rat doped up on bath salts with bloody hands and blood all over his face (and nothing in his hands) warrant the use of deadly force as he screams and lunges for the 240 lb body builder of a COP? The examples are endless, and hence the "... like other reasonable and prudent person(s)" nomenclature.
EDIT: The following will help show what I am referring to. Notice how the "Justice Dept" video starts right as the COPs are swinging away with the PR24's, do you really think they all just converged there and hopped out and started swinging? Trust me they did not. There is at least 2 minutes of footage out there and if I have to go chat with the detective that shown the entire vid to the class I will. Ultimately, I don't care who does or does not my position. I understand the positions of those who bandwagon and like to play the white knight. Again, the only point I was trying to make was in reference to the video of the soldier not showing the entire story and anything and everything any one of us said about it was all speculation, I just had a hard time with people saying it was fake when there was a lot of evidence showing otherwise, I was at least willing to NOT go the route of crucifying the soldier for reasons none of knew.
Here is the video of the media's (and midway's) view:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OauOPTwbqk