Author Topic: Rash of 109s and 190s  (Read 5731 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #60 on: February 17, 2013, 12:00:41 PM »
Yes, Spitfires are easy mode.  They were easy mode in WWII as well, and that is a good thing, contrary to popular opinion here.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7452
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #61 on: February 17, 2013, 12:09:21 PM »
I like the Spitfire, it's a cute toy, but the 109 is a fighting machine.
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10

MW148 LW301
"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez
"i’m good with just the game" - Animl-AW

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #62 on: February 17, 2013, 12:21:17 PM »
Spitfire looks nice, the 109 looks like a fighter.  :t

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #63 on: February 17, 2013, 12:45:49 PM »
Anything but a Brewster.  :aok

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #64 on: February 17, 2013, 12:58:19 PM »
As I experiment with different planes, there seems to be perimeters to fights that each is suited for in a rule of thumb sort of way.  As an example I have had great success coming off a carrier with a Seafire and jumping into a furball that is on or very near the deck.  It is slow, turns tight and has canons.  Not much can turn with it.  However, take the fight up a bit and it is in deep trouble.

I can deal with 109s and 190s on the deck easier than I can at 10K.  Any of the planes that have skyrocket like climb rates are hard for me to bet in that 5-10K range.

Unless they are pushed down or caught under a fighter cap, I don't see a lot of 109s and 190s low in my limited experience.

Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #65 on: February 17, 2013, 01:02:23 PM »
As I experiment with different planes, there seems to be perimeters to fights that each is suited for in a rule of thumb sort of way.  As an example I have had great success coming off a carrier with a Seafire and jumping into a furball that is on or very near the deck.  It is slow, turns tight and has canons.  Not much can turn with it.  However, take the fight up a bit and it is in deep trouble.

I can deal with 109s and 190s on the deck easier than I can at 10K.  Any of the planes that have skyrocket like climb rates are hard for me to bet in that 5-10K range.

Unless they are pushed down or caught under a fighter cap, I don't see a lot of 109s and 190s low in my limited experience.
You obviously haven't run into any muppets or latrobe yet  :lol :bolt:
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #66 on: February 17, 2013, 01:17:12 PM »
Spitfire looks nice, the 109 looks like a fighter.  :t
Too small and poor cockpit design = fighter?  :p
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #67 on: February 17, 2013, 01:18:34 PM »
Redbull,  :O.  Yes I have and it wasn't pretty.  :)  

LOL, I said easier, I did not say I could beat them.  I do look forward to encountering good sticks like you and Latrobe.  It makes for good training films for me albeit, they are always short.  Someday though, I hope to give y'all a hard time of it. :)


Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #68 on: February 17, 2013, 01:19:51 PM »
I meant the bit about not finding low 109s :P

You're coming along great for how long you've been playing, better than me :)
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #69 on: February 17, 2013, 01:20:08 PM »
Too small and poor cockpit design = fighter?  :p

Oh, and a flying tree is suppose to be?  :P






.... I love that flying tree though.

Offline Daddkev

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #70 on: February 17, 2013, 02:06:32 PM »
 :huh :huh :huh Im Nekked!!!  :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener: :neener:
God Bless America
Go tell Momm, im flying! and make me a sandwich !
EvilKev

2012 68KO Cup 1st Place finisher

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4299
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #71 on: February 17, 2013, 04:52:36 PM »
I meant the bit about not finding low 109s :P

You're coming along great for how long you've been playing, better than me :)

I appreciate that.  :aok

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #72 on: February 17, 2013, 05:11:04 PM »
Oh, and a flying tree is suppose to be?  :P






.... I love that flying tree though.

Well, the trees in AH had such a high K/D ratio I figured a flying one would be a sure winner....  :p
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline muzik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #73 on: February 17, 2013, 11:18:50 PM »
I like the Spitfire, it's a cute toy, but the 109 is a fighting machine.

Makes me think of "get me a squadron of Spitfires"

I'm picturing Goering being told his fighters were just slaughtered by toys and then being told "I want a toy too."

Spitfire looks nice, the 109 looks like a fighter.  :t

Must be where the expression "if looks could kill" came from .
Fear? You bet your life...but that all leaves you as you reach combat. Then there's a sense of great excitement, a thrill you can't duplicate anywhere...it's actually fun. Yes, I think it is the most exciting fun in the world. — Lt. Col. Robert B. "Westy" Westbrook, USAAF 6/<--lol@mod

Online Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15718
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Rash of 109s and 190s
« Reply #74 on: February 18, 2013, 12:06:20 AM »
1.  I'd wager that any decline in numbers in 2009/2010 is due to horrible world economy thoroughly kicking in about then.  For example:


2.  Pies are awesome.  I had one last Thursday at the pub (along with chips and a delicious Strongbow cider) and thought of Zack.

3.  The most pie-like aircraft should be the Hurricane (as there were more of them in Battle of Britain).