Author Topic: He177 ?  (Read 26841 times)

Offline Blunder

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
He177 ?
« on: February 18, 2013, 06:49:33 PM »
Hey guy. I havent played for quite some time, but I once said  I will definatly come back once the Heinkel He177 is brought to this game. So as I didnt find any  up to date plane list..has HTC already put it into the game or are there any plans to do so in the near future?
thanks! <S<

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2013, 06:57:11 PM »
has HTC already put it into the game


No.

or are there any plans to do so in the near future?

Nobody knows, but seems to be unlikely.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Franz Von Werra

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2013, 09:34:58 AM »
He-177 is 'the dream' for any Luftwaffe player. 109's and 190's might actually start using DROP TANKS doing 'bomber escort.'
The Luftwaffe side has small fighters, medium fighters, dive bombers, medium bombers, but no LARGE BOMBER! and its also a 'dive bomber!'
The He-177 had over 800 made.

Technical difficulties:
Rumors of the He-177 having technical difficulties. Yes some problems at start. Hmm, all planes had difficulties at start. (I'm sure the first porche cars had problems, but look at them today!)
A) the least technical difficulites plane? the BF-109 probably, because they were constantly improved since their first prototype in may 1935.
Hans Joachim Marseille 'Star of Africa' died to a bug or maintenance something... in a brand new BF-109g2, engine problems resulting in smoke in the cockpit. (so even every upgrade gets risk).
B) some rumor about prototype spitfires having their tails just fall off? LOL  We dont have that in game! There is a whole  thread about this in these boards somewhere, year ago?
C) the He-177 entered service in 1942. America was in the war at this point, meaning Germany was in deep doodoo. Demands were all over the Reich!!! Rushed introduction! One can not blame the plane for what was INDEED a rushed introduction!

A) How about if your plane's engine had an oil leak and your engine cooked within the first five minutes of flight because you didn't check the gauge! And/or smoke filled up cockpit, cant see and dead!
B) How about if YOU were about to land 10 KILLS for achievement, coming in for landing just right, and... and one your tire blows out! Your plane swings to one side and dead. <-- could happen in any plane.
If bugs and maintenance issues are not in the game, then they arent in the game! Periodoso!


He-177 vs He-111 which to add?
All the early luft bombers got chewed up durring the 'Battle for Brittain' but so did any and all bombers during the whole war if they didnt have proper fighter escort. Lancasters resorted to night flights but radar and equiped planes caught up to them too. This said, in the main arena, vs late war fighters, the 111 wouldnt stand a chance, the Ju-88 has about the same stats and performance, hence: the He-111 would be MORE OF THE SAME. For scenarios, the Japanese Ki-67 seems like a fine substitute. The He-177 would be a BIG Luftwaffe bomber, much more survivability in latewar with its size, number of guns, and more bombs. Sinking a CV for full credit might be more possible with He-177, and that trip to enemy strats in a formation of loaded He-177s would be a Luftwaffe pilot's historical dream to be relived in the skys of Aces High!

CV sinkers:
Ju-88: with torpedoes seems worthless vs a CV, the 5inch's kill me before I get anywhere near the firing range that I think I could hit. Its like replaying a film, same thing, same spot, everytime.
Ju-87: during the war, two 1000kg (2,202 lbs) sank a battleship, so the 4,000 lbs bomb should be able to also. USA dive bombers sank CV's.
Point is, if a player can SINGLE HANDEDLY kill a CV in one plane, then why not another. A formation of Bombers is a single player. So the two above should be able to also.
The 177 could do this just fine like any other - b17, lank, etc. During the war, btw, the Luftwaffe bombers sank more ships than the Uboats! 55% to 45% I read something like that somewhere.

size matters:
He-111: 53' length, 74' width
He-177: 72' length, 103' width  <-- bigger!

Defensive guns:
He-111: seven 7.92mm, two of which could be substituted with a 20mm and a 13mm.
He-177: one 7.92mm, two 20mm, four 13mm.  <--- that 'fire all guns' button would make a mess of any fighter! Might even compete with the B29 on this note.

speed:
He-111: uhh, 273mph?
He-177: 351 at 19,000 feet. <--- much faster!

Business stuff:
He-111: 12,300 lbs total?  2,000 kilograms (4,400 lb) in the main internal bomb bay. Up to 3,600 kilograms (7,900 lb) could be carried externally
He-177: 29,000 lbs total?  6,000 kg (13,227 lb) of ordnance internally/7,200 kg (15,873 lb) externally or up to 3 Fritz X or Henschel Hs 293 PGMs (remote control bombs) <-- earthquake maker!
The remote control bombs could possibly be added to the plane later on, sort of like the nuke on the B29.

Please don't blame the plane for its bad situation. It was unfairly rushed into service, and the Luftwaffe didnt even have enough fuel for its fighters, let alone these monstrocities. Had the war gone differently, these planes would have been pounding all of the Reich's happy wonderful innocent neighbors.
This game is about the machines, not the status of the countries involved - we are Bishops, Knights, and Rooks, so no fuel shortages here!
The He-177 is an awesome machine to add! Four engines, two large props! Could hold its own in the main (late war) arena. It is a unique plane also! Not more of the same!

Hands down, the 177 would be guaranteed fun for Luftwaffe pilots! A true novelty for them of how things could have been!
And the best challenge for the allied figthers to shoot down!
Allied pilots would get more excited spotting a He-177 formation than when they see a slow and low 190a8!!! <-- who would want to deny an allied player of the most drooling target ever spotted in the skys of Aces High?!?!?!

« Last Edit: February 21, 2013, 09:53:08 AM by Franz Von Werra »
fuel burn 1x please! - '1x Wednesdays?'

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7312
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2013, 09:59:41 AM »
H model is here... soon  :x :x
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10


"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline STXAce8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 724
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2013, 03:34:01 PM »
H model is here... soon  :x :x
Not of the 111.  :noid
ZLA- Don't Focke Wulf Us!
Ingame: Batz
Kommando Nowotny
Its over the top as Fack

Offline jag88

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 142
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2013, 09:57:06 PM »
The He-177 would be the only survivable non-perk axis bomber...
The 88 in my name has nothing to do with nazis, skinheads or any other type of half-wit, nor with the "ideas" they support.

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2013, 10:17:43 PM »
Just give them the condor we ally pilots will drool.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2013, 10:24:17 PM »
The He-177 would be the only survivable non-perk axis bomber...
The existence of the H8K2 'Emily' suggests otherwise.

Also, should the He177 be modeled to the fantasies of the Luftwaffe fans here (330mph, 13,000lb bomb load, defended by 20mm cannons) it most certainly would need to be perked.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2013, 10:49:02 PM »
It wasn't defended by 20mm cannons?
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2013, 11:02:39 PM »
It wasn't defended by 20mm cannons?
Some.  My point was that on paper it is clearly a perk bomber.  The fact that in reality it was one of the most disastrous weapons programs ever and never lived up to its goals is the problem.  In AH it would be a wonder-bomber, combining the B-17G and Lancaster into one platform that would, should it not be perked, dominate the bomber aspect of the game.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2013, 11:18:44 PM »
You should be careful throwing around words like "fantasies" and "disastrous". What was so "disastrous" about the He 177A-3 onwards? The A-5, produced from December 1943, was a superb aircraft.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2013, 12:36:44 AM »
That didn't stop the problems with the plane. It resolved the "bursts into flames when you push throttle up" but there were many other problems and engines still failed as did other systems onboard the plane.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2013, 01:51:29 AM »
The He 177 suffered from maintenance issues late in the war. That's about it. The He 177 was a very advanced aircraft, in many ways similar to the B-29. While the USAAF did manage to maintain the B-29 with some effort, the Luftwaffe simply did not have the proper facilities and logistical support to maintain the He 177 in the field. These issues would not affect a future AH version of the He 177 since maintenance issues are not modeled.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Franz Von Werra

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2013, 02:09:29 AM »
*edit: 1,169 built, total?  :rolleyes:

(Gsholz, during late war, anywhere in the Reich, even public toilets needed maitenance; for example, in most cases, the whole city, with the building and the toilet may have only been a pile of rocks, and the janitors / plumbers probably dead! You name one thing inside of their territory that didnt lack maintenance! Nevermind!  :headscratch:)

and check out the 75mm anti tank cannon option!  1/72nd Revell Model Kit.
http://www.swannysmodels.com/He177.html  <---- bomb tanks or cannon them, HO fighters or kill them with other guns, Sniper enemy bombers from out of their defensive fire range!

In this video it shows FOUR TORPEDEOS! two at bomb-bay area, two more out under each wing, even I might be able to hit a CV with a formation of these things? Only bomber in game that could cary four?
3x bomber formation = 12xtorpedo salvo! LOL TAKE OUT THE WHOLE FLEET! HAHAHA
This plane could win the war all by itself!

Hmm, that CV 5-inch is probably still too tuff.
Also, this shows how the wheels tuck in to the wings. Neato.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKuXu7wH5FE

Zoomable pictures of a 1/48 scale model of it, could base the whole computer design graphics of the plane from measuring this kit?
http://www.eduard.com/store/Eduard/Photo-etched-parts/Zoom-set/Aircraft/1-48/He-177-Greif-interior-1-48.html

Put this on the front page of the website...
Image is from Microsoft Flightsim 2004, bad graphics, either way that game is flying only, every Luftwaffe player in the game would be crying with joy! 'Luftwhinners?' change to happy 'Luftcriers!' :*)**
http://www.flight-simulator-world.org/images/flight-simulator/He177.JPG
uhh, allywhiners? HAHA

Oh, and thank you for the He-111. I take back what I said in early post, I might even wind up with a bomber rank! Very happy luftwaffe pilot here! He-177 would tip the scale entirely though!  :salute

fuel burn 1x please! - '1x Wednesdays?'

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: He177 ?
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2013, 02:29:17 AM »
Some.  My point was that on paper it is clearly a perk bomber.  The fact that in reality it was one of the most disastrous weapons programs ever and never lived up to its goals is the problem.  In AH it would be a wonder-bomber, combining the B-17G and Lancaster into one platform that would, should it not be perked, dominate the bomber aspect of the game.

That is the thing.  She would clearly be perked.  No way in hell would they not perk her.  How perked it would be is the question though.  As for the engines...

Starting with the He 177 A-3/R2, a modified engine nacelle with a new "power system", the Daimler-Benz DB 610, each of which consisted of a pair of Daimler-Benz DB 605s set up to work as one as the DB 606 had been, was used to eliminate the tendency for engine fires.[23] With the introduction of the DB 610 came several improvements including the relocation of the engine oil tank, the lengthening of the engine mountings by 20 cm (8 in), the complete redesign of the exhaust system which also facilitated the installation of exhaust dampers for night missions, and the setting of a power limitation on the engines which resulted in greater reliability. These modifications, supposedly numbering 56 of both major and minor varieties, were successful as far as eliminating engine fires were concerned, but other minor problems with the transfer gearbox between the two component engines of each "power system" and their shared propeller remained.

I know it's from wiki, so doesn't hold much salt.  Governing the engines could be something that is hard coded.  Or they could leave it be, to where you can flame yourself out of them.  Though you'll probably start to see 177 pilots ask why the 29 won't flame out.  So going with the governing code my be a better option.


This one is a doozy regardless.  However, even I would have to fully disagree with it being a Non-Perked plane.  Definitely perk her. :aok  I'll likely fly her as much, if only slightly more than the B-29.  Reason I say that is that she's likely to get off the ground a bit easier with 100% fuel vs the B-29. :)
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.