Heh, that is the difference, I only speak for myself and do not pretend to speak for others while accusing other people of doing the same. That level of "reasoning" is likely also steared you towards conjuring some imaginary confusion, better luck next time.
So, same point as Karnak, people with little knowledge of the war would consider the He-111 as the iconic bomber, I agree, only ignorance or lack of knowledge can drive you to such conclusion when the Ju-88 was produced in three times the number while seeing front line service in far more roles until the very end of the war.

you are funny in a pathetic sort of way. maybe you didn't play in the dirt enough as a kid or something. again, you should stop using the word
iconic since you're clearly looking for
useful to you.
the ju-88 could have been produced in twice the numbers as the bf-109 and that still would not have made it as much of an iconic war time image as the he-111, p-40, b-17, bf-109, a6m zero, p-51 or the spitfire.
even movie studios from the 60s were more aware of what iconic was...
