Everyone else? Or Perdue and his squad? Give me an example of Perdue arguing either
the content or context of rules in a setup that involved anyone other than himself,
his squad or his side. Honestly, I don't see him having the character to even try.
Even with people who may dislike perd and his 'attitude' in general, I very much doubt that you will find many who would agree with this statement. If anything, he has taken an interest (as with the rest of the squad) in every scenario and fso studying the maps and looking at the objectives, and has been a vocal critic of some 'rules'. . . your accusation which includes a personal attack on his character "Honestly, I don't see him having the character to even try." is far more harsh than anything he or any of us have said in this post. Should he send this up and have you banned? No, because of his character.
This is the kind of thing I have been talking about.
Now about me, I am a Pig in MA, I think there are quite a few baconites who will vouch for my character as someone who does not take sides for sentimental or personal reasons - I see a real disparity here, I see someone getting ganged up on the same way Midway was in the MA. People go too far, and people are well overstepping here. I implore you to read perd's original post - he is not saying the ban is wrong (even though there is a wierd gray zone there) or that he was banned - but how he was banned and how far that ban went. The squad CiC duties should not have been a part of the ban, and the reason it was part of the ban is because there was not proper due process. That is my problem - you picking on perd is not my problem.
