Author Topic: realistic gunnery  (Read 1956 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
realistic gunnery
« Reply #45 on: March 08, 2001, 11:50:00 AM »
For those of you who think:

1. I am totally supportive of the current icon displays

and/or

2. That other folks haven't made some pretty fine suggestions that are worthy of experimentation

Please review these posts I made ...and the threads in which they reside... before you come to the conclusion that I totally support the current icon system and that this "icon discussion" is "all new".  

10/15/99
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/000753.html

11/16/99
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/001032.html
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/001128.html
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/001384.html
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/001666.html
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/002452.html


Just a few links to threads that have discussed this all before...back to the beginning of beta.

I hope it clairfies my position on icons.

I hope the threads they are in provide a few alternatives to the present icons that perhaps you folks haven't considered.

 
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
realistic gunnery
« Reply #46 on: March 08, 2001, 01:43:00 PM »
i am surprised more people arent whinin about the .50 calibers - man, i almost got cranky when one 1/2 inch bullet took the entire back of my 109 off from 13 football fields away! jeez what a shot- why dont they use that is bldg demolition instead of those pesky torches and saws and high explosives  


i suppose it is necessary to give the buffs tough guns to keep them competitive but it is going to have me fightin like a sissy (well, more of a sissy) soon - them things is deadly!

Offline Vila

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
      • http://www.flyingpigs.com
realistic gunnery
« Reply #47 on: March 08, 2001, 02:34:00 PM »
I'd be happy if two things happen:

1)  turn off the laser accurate range number (or make it a lot less precise)

2)  Scale the hit sprites better.  Too easy to tell you're hitting the plane at longer ranges.

I think doing those 2 things would make gunnery more reasonable.  Just MHO.

 

------------------
Vila <Flying Pigs>
Oink! Oink! To War!

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
realistic gunnery
« Reply #48 on: March 08, 2001, 02:51:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Vila:
I'd be happy if two things happen:
1)  turn off the laser accurate range number (or make it a lot less precise)
 

turn off mmm....ok i like t but:
can you imagine the resultant whinage from said move?

'you hit me from 22 miles away chog meany!'

'no i was only 100yds!'

'you're porked you gamer i am tellin my mommy!'

[This message has been edited by mrfish (edited 03-08-2001).]

Ice

  • Guest
realistic gunnery
« Reply #49 on: March 08, 2001, 04:08:00 PM »
Tac....just a quick question?

Do you currently fly in the MA with icons off?

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
realistic gunnery
« Reply #50 on: March 08, 2001, 07:27:00 PM »
Ice, do you use your 2 feet to move your joystick? Im not going to handicap myself.

I have tried a few times just for fun though. Got murdered in an instant when the target I was following manouvered out of sight and then got into my 6 as I extended. Makes you wonder eh?

"It ensures that you have less information than you would have in the same RL situation in most cases. This is a key part of the argument you seem to want to ignore"

Between having a little less than RL situation in "most cases" and having way too much information... well, lets just say the first one would be damn closer to simulating combat in those days.

But hey, if you've decided otherwise, go ahead and say it, im suggesting it be done.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
realistic gunnery
« Reply #51 on: March 08, 2001, 08:30:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Tac:
Between having a little less than RL situation in "most cases" and having way too much information...

I'm not saying "a little less". YOU are saying "a little less."

I think it's SIGNIFICANTLY less. But what do I know right Tac?

I've been a very fortunate person. Since I was very young I wanted to fly. I realized my dream and for the last 28 years when I was "at work" (and at play) I've been viewing the world from the inside of a cockpit. I've looked at a lot of other aircraft from within those cockpits. In all kinds of weather and at all different ranges.

I've flown lots of things from Piper Cubs to B-747's. Jet trainers and transports, prop sport aerobatics and old WW2 Trainers. I own a PT and I'm part owner of a Vultee BT-13.

I'm in a CAF squadron and I fly formation and do airshows with other guys in other WW2 aircraft. We "dogfight" when we get the chance.

One fine day at Offutt AFB I was part of a CAF "Tora, Tora, Tora" show and was right in the middle of all the explosions, passes from "Zeros" and a dozen other fighters. That day my old Wing Commander boom and zoomed me for 5 minutes in his P-51 "Gunfighter II" as I turned my little PT to "spoil his shot". He clearly won, BTW. But I got a great view of a -51 in the attack mode.  

Three years ago, I flew in a B-25 for almost two hours. My dad flew it from the right seat for the last hour or so. He hadn't flown one for over 40 years; what a great day. We had a P-47, a Yak-9, two T-28's and a T-6 on our wing as we circled San Francisco Bay twice and went back out to sea for some fun. I watched from the sextant dome as all these guys make hi-side passes on us for about 30 minutes. I also sat at the nose gun and tracked them as they extended out front.

But... none of that means didly. I'll defer to your expertise on how WW2 ACM should look on a PC.  

Since, after all, you know exactly how much visual information is "too much". No need to try to improve Icons in the hopes of providing accurate RL visual cues. Nope, just totally get rid of them. As you implied with a previous post, what does RL experience have to do with this anyway, right? A simulated RL experience is not a goal here.

Say Tac, after you get "no icons" how about you starting a campaign to artifically limit all guns to a range of 250 yards? That way, ACM becomes even MORE important. So the "good modeling/good ACM-ing" factor increases even more. Gets rid of those dang "spray and pray" dweebs at the same time...forever! In fact, it essentially nullifies the difference between MG and Cannon armament as well. No more Hispano problem!

Then, we can improve the "armor" on the target aircraft so that you have to pour most of an ammo load into a guy to nail him. One sim tried that already, IIRC.     That'll punish the guys that try to spray from that max 250 yard range and make 'em REALLY get in close.

Man, we'll be maximizing that ACM-ing positive experience then, won't we?

Then we can dictate a "pure HA" arena so there'll be no more of this "blue on blue" fratricide.

Yeah BABY! I bet HTC will have to add another server once you get those changes implemented.

[/sarcasm]

You know, listening to you tell me how this all should look and Ram telling me how pulling G's should feel has been quite an experience.

It's sort of like listening to a 5 year old kid tell me exactly how it would feel to make mad passionate love to the Playboy Playmate of the Year for a never-ending week in the surf at Cabo.

It's not a learning experience by any means but it sure provides a lot of comic relief.

 

Do what ya like.....I'm outta this thread. I do hope you get a separate "no icon" arena. Be interesting to see how long it survives.  

[This message has been edited by Toad (edited 03-08-2001).]
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!