Author Topic: Report of the joint fighter conference  (Read 1004 times)

Offline Vinkman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Report of the joint fighter conference
« on: August 08, 2013, 01:35:31 PM »
I bought this book but was dissapointed that lla the pilot reports of the Planes was edited out, and anly the minutes of the meetings was included. the book I bought was 356 pages or so, but the fullreport is over 1000 pages. I assume the missing pages are the pilots reports of the planes themselves.

Does anyone know how to get the full report?

Thanks.

vinkman  :salute
Who is John Galt?

Offline muzik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2013, 06:59:25 PM »
I bought this book but was dissapointed that lla the pilot reports of the Planes was edited out, and anly the minutes of the meetings was included. the book I bought was 356 pages or so, but the fullreport is over 1000 pages. I assume the missing pages are the pilots reports of the planes themselves.

Does anyone know how to get the full report?

Thanks.

vinkman  :salute

Talk to a librarian about inter-library loan. If that doesnt work, the library of congress.
Fear? You bet your life...but that all leaves you as you reach combat. Then there's a sense of great excitement, a thrill you can't duplicate anywhere...it's actually fun. Yes, I think it is the most exciting fun in the world. — Lt. Col. Robert B. "Westy" Westbrook, USAAF 6/<--lol@mod

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2013, 06:59:43 PM »
Some of the aircraft at the conference.....

My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15521
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2013, 02:24:05 AM »
I'd love to know how a Tigercat stacked up against a Bearcat in evaluations of dogfighting ability.

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3993
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2013, 04:06:15 AM »
Tigercat is one big bird :O
Wish they entered service faster :furious
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2013, 05:34:24 AM »
What's the single-engine job two to the left (as you look at the picture) of the C-47?
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2013, 05:44:32 AM »
What's the single-engine job two to the left (as you look at the picture) of the C-47?

Looks like a SBC2 Helldiver.

Very cool pic btw, just like that pic from FG COs' meeting. More of these please. :)
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2013, 09:17:35 AM »
Here's the same image, annotated....

Right click on the image and open it in another tab to see it larger......

« Last Edit: August 09, 2013, 09:19:08 AM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2013, 09:19:52 AM »
Thanks both.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2013, 09:26:14 AM »
That biplane looks a lot like UC-43 (if it's a biplane - hard to make out the top wing).

Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2013, 09:27:15 AM »
That biplane looks a lot like UC-43.

(Image removed from quote.)

You are very likely correct.... Good eye!
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Frod

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2013, 02:46:55 PM »
I believe that I read that the French didn't accept the Tigercat (postwar) because of the lack of rudder authority at low speed.

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3993
Re: Report of the joint fighter conference
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2013, 11:09:27 AM »
Here's the same image, annotated....

Right click on the image and open it in another tab to see it larger......

(Image removed from quote.)
awsome pic!! :aok
makes me want to draw them
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle