NO They don't. They suffer some minor collateral damage from the ack box shooting around their formation. If the ack box was the same size as a fighters ack box both drones would be toast as soon as they got in range of the cv.
Your argument early about the speed of the ac and a wider ack box inverse to the higher speed of the ac makes my point. Low Slow ac Like huge bellybutton bombers should be toast period.
honestly karnak you should play in the game to have a opinion. Guys who don't play in the game yet have everything to say is to me the guy who wont vote at election time.
See the 1999 registration date by my name? That is how long I have played this game, and while I don't play much any more I still have plenty of in game experience. You're spouting off myths and chat buffer BS like it is fact when it is flat out false.
The bombers do get hit, they just don't go down.
Let me give you a tested and verified comparison in durability.
Hispano Mk II hits from 50 yards needed to take the tail off:
B-17G: 17
Lancaster: 14
Mosquito Mk VI: 3
Bf110G-2: 2
The B-17G's tail takes more than eight times the damage that the Bf110G-2's tail takes.
The puffy ack box for the bombers flying 250mph is
smaller than the puffy ack box for the P-51D flying at 400mph. I don't care what you think or have been told by other clueless players, of whom there are many. I take HiTech's word, and my experience support him, over chat buffer complaints. I have no idea why you think the bombers would be destroyed if the puffy ack box was the same size as the fighter's box as it is a completely illogical belief. Any single one of those "minor collateral damage" hits would destroy a single engined fighter, and the bombers take many of them because they get spread out over the aircraft. Fighters never get the chance to have the damage spread out as they can't take a single hit unless they get lucky.