Author Topic: The Furniture Bomber  (Read 3721 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
The Furniture Bomber
« on: August 25, 2013, 08:42:52 AM »
 :airplane: One of the truly great stories of the second world war was that of the Mosquito fighter-bombers, there contribution to saving Britain from Germany and their unique method of construction and manufacturing.
Role
Fast bomber
Fighter-bomber
Night fighter
Maritime strike aircraft
 Fast photo-reconnaissance aircraft

Manufacturer
de Havilland Aircraft Company

First flight
25 November 1940

The de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito was a British multi-role combat aircraft with a two-man crew that served during the Second World War and the postwar era. The Mosquito was one of the few operational front-line aircraft of the World War II era to be constructed almost entirely of wood and, as such, was nicknamed "The Wooden Wonder". The Mosquito was also known affectionately as the "Mossie" to its crews Originally conceived as an unarmed fast bomber, the Mosquito was adapted to many other roles during the air war, including low- to medium-altitude daytime tactical bomber, high-altitude night bomber, pathfinder, day or night fighter, fighter-bomber, intruder, maritime strike aircraft, and fast photo-reconnaissance aircraft. It was also used by the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) as a transport.

When the Mosquito entered production in 1941, it was one of the fastest operational aircraft in the world. Entering widespread service in 1942, the Mosquito first operated as a high-speed, high-altitude photo-reconnaissance aircraft, and continued to operate in this role throughout the war. From mid-1942 to mid-1943 Mosquito bombers were used in high-speed, medium- or low-altitude missions, attacking factories, railways and other pinpoint targets within Germany and German-occupied Europe. From late 1943, Mosquito bomber units were formed into the Light Night Strike Force and used as pathfinders for RAF Bomber Command's heavy-bomber raids. They were also used as "nuisance" bombers, often dropping 4,000 lb (1,812 kg) "cookies", in high-altitude, high-speed raids that German night fighters were almost powerless to intercept.

As a night fighter, from mid-1942, the Mosquito was used to intercept Luftwaffe raids on the United Kingdom, most notably defeating the German aerial offensive, Operation Steinbock, in 1944. Offensively, starting in July 1942, some Mosquito night-fighter units conducted intruder raids over Luftwaffe airfields and, as part of 100 Group, the Mosquito was used as a night fighter and intruder in support of RAF Bomber Command's heavy bombers, and played an important role in reducing bomber losses during 1944 and 1945. As a fighter-bomber in the Second Tactical Air Force, the Mosquito took part in "special raids", such as the attack on Amiens Prison in early 1944, and in other precision attacks against Gestapo or German intelligence and security forces. Second Tactical Air Force Mosquitos also played an important role operating in tactical support of the British Army during the 1944 Normandy Campaign. From 1943 Mosquitos were used by RAF Coastal Command strike squadrons, attacking Kriegsmarine U-boats (particularly in the 1943 Bay of Biscay offensive, where significant numbers of U-boats were sunk or damaged) and intercepting transport ship concentrations.



The oval-section fuselage was a frameless monocoque shell built in two halves being formed to shape by band clamps over a mahogany or concrete mould, each holding one half of the fuselage, split vertically. The shell halves were made of sheets of Ecuadorean balsawood sandwiched between sheets of Canadian birch, but in areas needing extra strength— such as along cut-outs— stronger woods replaced the balsa filler; the overall thickness of the birch and balsa sandwich skin was only 7⁄16 inches (11 mm). This sandwich skin was so stiff that no internal reinforcement was necessary from the wing's rear spar to the tail bearing bulkhead. The join was along the vertical centre line. This split construction greatly aided the assembly of the internal equipment as it allowed the technicians easy access to the fuselage interior. While the glue in the plywood skin dried, carpenters cut a sawtooth joint into the edges of the fuselage shells, while other workers installed the controls and cabling on the inside wall. When the glue completely dried, the two halves were glued and screwed together. The fuselage was strengthened internally by seven bulkheads made up of two plywood skins parted by spruce blocks, which formed the basis on each half for the outer shell. Each bulkhead was a repeat of the spruce design for the fuselage halves; a balsa sheet sandwich between two plywood sheets/skins. Bulkhead number seven carried the fittings and loads for the tailplane and rudder, The type of glue originally used was Casein resin, which was later replaced by "Aerolite", a synthetic urea-formaldehyde, which was more durable. Many other types of screws and flanges (made of various woods) also held the structure together.

The fuselage construction joints were made from balsa wood and plywood strips with the spruce multi-ply being connected by a balsa V joint, along with the interior frame. The spruce would be reinforced by plywood strips at the point where the two halves joined to form the V-joint. Located on top of the joint the plywood formed the outer skin. During the joining of the two halves ("boxing up"), two laminated wooden clamps would be used in the after portion of the fuselage to act as support. A covering of doped Madapolam (a fine plain woven cotton) fabric was stretched tightly over the shell and a coat of silver dope was applied, after which the exterior camouflage was applied. The fuselage had a large ventral section cut-out, which was braced during construction, to allow it to be lowered onto the wing centre-section. Once the wing was secured the lower panels were replaced, and the bomb bay or armament doors fitted.

The all-wood wing was built as a one-piece structure and was not divided into separate construction sections. It was made up of two main spars, spruce and plywood compression ribs, stringers, and a plywood covering. The outer plywood skin was covered and doped like the fuselage. The wing was installed into the roots by means of four large attachment points. The engine radiators were fitted in the inner wing, just outboard of the fuselage on either side. These gave less drag. The radiators themselves were split into three sections: an oil cooler section outboard, the middle section forming the coolant radiator and the inboard section serving the cabin heater. The wing contained metal framed and skinned ailerons, but the flaps were made of wood and were hydraulically controlled. The nacelles were mostly wood, although, for strength, the engine mounts were all metal as were the undercarriage parts. Engine mounts of welded steel tube were added, along with simple landing gear oleos filled with rubber blocks. Wood was used to carry only in-plane loads, with metal fittings used for all triaxially loaded components such as landing gear, engine mounts, control surface mounting brackets, and the wing-to-fuselage junction. The outer leading wing edge had to be brought 22 inches (56 cm) further forward to accommodate this design.The main tail unit was all wood built. The control surfaces, the rudder and elevator were aluminium framed and fabric covered. The total weight of metal castings and forgings used in the aircraft was only 280 lb (130 kg).

Would or could the world ever see another aircraft developed and built such as the Mosquitos? I doubt it, but it just goes to show you what skilled craftsman can do when given the tools and design concepts to work with!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10435
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2013, 01:26:38 PM »
 Earl,

  I have a close connection with the mossie,not only is it a fav of mine but I had an uncle who worked for DH in Canada and built a couple of the wooden wonders!

   Not bad for a canoe maker.... :devil



    :salute

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2013, 01:39:28 PM »
Quote
Hermann Goering:
In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked.

 :t
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2013, 09:15:45 PM »

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2013, 05:32:57 AM »
While the mosquito was conceived and later hailed as the unarmed bomber, more armed mosquitoes were built than unarmed variants - and quite heavily armed at that.

The first mosquitoes were not bombers, but PR and night fighter (F.II) variants. At the time, Britain was still on the defense and the LW was running a night bombing campaign, so night fighters were needed more than bombers. PR mosquitoes were in extremely high demand and in north Africa, the command was practically begging for them. Only after a few batches of these variants were delivered, DH started to produce the B.IV bombers. The most produced variants were the fighter-bombers. So labeling the mossie as mainly a "bomber" is a bit misleading. I'd dare say that out of all its roles, the pure bomber role had the least impact on the war compared to PR, night fighter and fighter-bomber (with all its derived roles).

DH did a preliminary study and design of a day-time fighter variant, but the RAF did not show interest. They were quite happy with their spitfires and did not need a twin, long rage, day time fighter - bomber command was operating at night and did not need day time escorts like the Americans were using. Much later the DH fighter was redesigned as a new plane and produced under the name DH Hornet.

It was said that the only problem with the mosquitoes was that there never seem to be enough of them.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2013, 05:42:32 AM by bozon »
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2013, 07:25:31 AM »
It's a beautiful, beautiful machine.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2013, 08:47:58 AM »
VVVVVRRRRUUUUMMMM!!!!!



ANGRY MOSQUITOES! LOOK OUT, THEY BITE!




FRIGGIN' LASER BEAMS!



A night fighter whose hangar has been bombed by the bish horde:
Don't exit dude! just rearm!


Annnddd... some Israeli mosquitoes:


And this is where my mossie fascination started - My aunt has several IAF photo albums, the kind that were popular as gifts on independence days, especially after the 6-days war. One of them had on its cover a picture of a pilot with a hard-man expression, hands on his hips, looking above the horizon. Towering above him was a large twin engine plane, guns sticking out in front, looking as mean as the pilot. That picture left a lasting impression on me and I knew what a Mossie was since I was 8. The original album is tucked away somewhere in storage, but I found the picture on the net, on the cover of a hebrew modeling magazine:


Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2013, 09:10:28 AM »
I am pretty sure the 1st photo is taken from the movie 633 Squadron.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2013, 11:26:13 AM »
During the war, and beyond, the Brit Aerospace Industry was a world beater. I dont think it gets enough credit. Neither in design of air frames or the skill of its airmen.  America didnt win the air war alone.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2013, 01:23:55 PM »
While the mosquito was conceived and later hailed as the unarmed bomber, more armed mosquitoes were built than unarmed variants - and quite heavily armed at that.

The first mosquitoes were not bombers, but PR and night fighter (F.II) variants. At the time, Britain was still on the defense and the LW was running a night bombing campaign, so night fighters were needed more than bombers. PR mosquitoes were in extremely high demand and in north Africa, the command was practically begging for them. Only after a few batches of these variants were delivered, DH started to produce the B.IV bombers. The most produced variants were the fighter-bombers. So labeling the mossie as mainly a "bomber" is a bit misleading. I'd dare say that out of all its roles, the pure bomber role had the least impact on the war compared to PR, night fighter and fighter-bomber (with all its derived roles).

DH did a preliminary study and design of a day-time fighter variant, but the RAF did not show interest. They were quite happy with their spitfires and did not need a twin, long rage, day time fighter - bomber command was operating at night and did not need day time escorts like the Americans were using. Much later the DH fighter was redesigned as a new plane and produced under the name DH Hornet.

It was said that the only problem with the mosquitoes was that there never seem to be enough of them.
:airplane: I really didn't intend to include the fighter variant, as evidenced by the title "The Furniture Bomber". But your point is well taken and not sure if the Brit's would have prevailed without the aid of this great aircraft and the brave young men who flew them in all kinds of weather and into the unknown, just over the horizon!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2013, 01:25:12 PM »
During the war, and beyond, the Brit Aerospace Industry was a world beater. I dont think it gets enough credit. Neither in design of air frames or the skill of its airmen.  America didnt win the air war alone.
:airplane: You sir are correct! Without the Brits attitude of never quit, the war might have had a different outcome!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2013, 01:26:45 PM »
Earl,

  I have a close connection with the mossie,not only is it a fav of mine but I had an uncle who worked for DH in Canada and built a couple of the wooden wonders!

   Not bad for a canoe maker.... :devil



    :salute
:airplane: Would sure like to hear his stories concerning the construction. Someone who actually worked on these aircraft is usually a little different than the history writers version of events!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2013, 01:28:00 PM »
VVVVVRRRRUUUUMMMM!!!!!

(Image removed from quote.)

ANGRY MOSQUITOES! LOOK OUT, THEY BITE!

(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)

FRIGGIN' LASER BEAMS!

(Image removed from quote.)

A night fighter whose hangar has been bombed by the bish horde:
Don't exit dude! just rearm!
(Image removed from quote.)

Annnddd... some Israeli mosquitoes:
(Image removed from quote.)

And this is where my mossie fascination started - My aunt has several IAF photo albums, the kind that were popular as gifts on independence days, especially after the 6-days war. One of them had on its cover a picture of a pilot with a hard-man expression, hands on his hips, looking above the horizon. Towering above him was a large twin engine plane, guns sticking out in front, looking as mean as the pilot. That picture left a lasting impression on me and I knew what a Mossie was since I was 8. The original album is tucked away somewhere in storage, but I found the picture on the net, on the cover of a hebrew modeling magazine:

(Image removed from quote.)

:airplane: Great pic's and thanks for sharing them with us!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10435
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2013, 02:02:24 PM »
Mosquito production at Downsview

http://www.museevirtuel-virtualmuseum.ca/sgc-cms/histoires_de_chez_nous-community_memories/pm_v2.php?id=thumbnail_gallery&fl=0&lg=English&ex=00000430&pos=1

morf, maybe you will see your uncle in a photo.


   Thx Milo,I've been to that site a few times,havent seen every pic but I did look to see if I could find him.   I'm not sure I would recognize him anyways,he was pretty young at the time.



   :salute

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10435
Re: The Furniture Bomber
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2013, 02:15:22 PM »
:airplane: Would sure like to hear his stories concerning the construction. Someone who actually worked on these aircraft is usually a little different than the history writers version of events!


 As would I Earl but sadly he passed quite some time ago.   As a youngster he told me some stories but 1 always stuck in my head,he said they used hand saws,ya hand saws to cut the fuselage to set it ontop of the wings. Oh and the Canuks used Robertson screws,a square drive screw that wouldn't fall off the screwdriver and it greatly sped up production.

   I'm not sure if the "Robertsons" made it across the pond or not as they were another Canuk invention.


   :salute