Author Topic: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI  (Read 17122 times)

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #120 on: September 26, 2013, 08:07:03 AM »
That's it?  After all that preaching and Nazi propaganda and that's the best you can do?

Come on Joe.  At least check with you astrologers :aok
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #121 on: September 26, 2013, 08:53:19 AM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: September 26, 2013, 09:10:01 AM by Skuzzy »
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #122 on: September 26, 2013, 09:12:41 AM »
Apologies to mods.

Bottom line is, everything needed to determine XVI production has been posted in this thread. Some posters are too lazy to go do their homework. I won't post info to be cherry-picked by, ah, certain posters.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #123 on: September 26, 2013, 10:25:42 AM »
Dan, Neil Sterling has posted some documents on the RAF a/c strength as of April 26 1945.
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/strength-r-f-26th-april-1945-a-38562.html

It lists 538 Spitfire LF XVI and 59 Spitfire F XVI in the UK.

Your remember how Barbi went on and on about the small numbers of Spitfire XIV? The document has 500 in the UK.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #124 on: September 26, 2013, 05:16:19 PM »
Yes, I remember that, and it should be pointed out that, in this case, "UK" means GB and the continent - 2nd TAF numbers are in there.

Thank Gawd Barbi and Crumpp aren't around here anymore - the latter would no doubt find some way of using that document to claim 2 TAF was never in Europe...
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #125 on: September 26, 2013, 10:24:09 PM »
We have had this same conversation too many times.   :headscratch:
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #126 on: September 27, 2013, 02:00:13 AM »
Dan, Neil Sterling has posted some documents on the RAF a/c strength as of April 26 1945.
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/strength-r-f-26th-april-1945-a-38562.html

It lists 538 Spitfire LF XVI and 59 Spitfire F XVI in the UK.

Your remember how Barbi went on and on about the small numbers of Spitfire XIV? The document has 500 in the UK.

To judge by the other sources which have been posted here ( :bhead) those totals will include both aircraft which were in schools, test and delivery units etc, and aircraft which had been damaged in battle or in accidents which were still on strength but awaiting write-off.

I can tell (almost) everyone what those numbers were if you're interested.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Franz Von Werra

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #127 on: October 10, 2013, 11:18:23 PM »
NOT TROLLING JUST TRYING TO LEARN STUFF HERE... K?

Yeah yeah I'm sorry too if trolled... but I call it like I see it.....oooohhhkkaaay?
at least don't throw WILD accusations around!  ;)
and post bad pictures!
I only posted one video... pm me and i'll link it to you!  :D

BACK TO BUSINESS OF SOLVING THIS DEBATE?
So now from MiloMorai's list, there were about 600 SpitXVI's, combined total for both USA and England in force, in May of 1945?
Maybe they saw a bunch of combat and some got shot down? But ONLY 600 late war spits at end of war???

To explain away some possible confusion... DID THE SPIT 16 SEE COMBAT? (short answer... probably!) : P
Adolf Galland's Book, "first to the last"... (he says a lot of stuff, mostly blames Goering and Hitler, seems never himself though!)
At first, Werner Molders was in charge of all luft fighter planes but he was mostly on the Eastern front. Galland was in charge, under Molders, of the western front, but when Molders died in November 1941, Galland was then head of all fighters.

Things Galland said: (go see his book, I can't find my copy, read it years ago)...
1) When the allieds were bombing Germany, the decision was made to station the luft fighters mostly IN Germany to PROTECT Germany. Yes this was sacrificing just about anything in France. Ofcourse this is western front, eastern front had fighters on the front line the whole time.
2) Also, "Following the latest bomb craters" a chapter that he talks about moving the Luft fighters to protect the LAST target, which wouldn't be the NEXT target sooo "following the craters"... even stationed in Germany, it was only till later when the Radar was helping...
2.5) He even speaks of a specific time... reports of "enemy planes" which were actually the Luftwaffe fighters... The Luftwaffe fighters this day were actually SEARCHING FOR THEMSELVES heh...

When D-day happened, there is a poster I saw long ago, by Galland showing the Normandy beach "Even our own troops asked the obvious question "where is the luftwaffe.""
3) At this time, D-day, as planned, the Luft fighters stationed in Germany moved to west to forward preset luft airbases in France. But, they ran into enemy fighters along the way, and so they got diverted to all over, total chaos? And some of the bases were already freshly bombed, or capped by enemy fighters, or too many planes at a small airbase while not enough at a fully stocked larger airbase... Yes, after D-day the luft went back into France but didn't actually reach the coast too much?
4) For a lot of 1944', Galland was "taking 'remainder planes from all over and putting them into his private reserve - a LARGE stash air-wing (I forgot the squad name)... The pilots were trained extensively to intercept bombers, I think he had about 1000 fighters? (I can't find the book). Gallands idea was to try to basically decimate an entire allied-1000-bomber-raid. At one time, the usa was sending about 500 to 600 fighter planes with the 1000 bombers. Some of the USA high command was recommending upping it to 2 fighters per bomber, so 2000 fighters per 1000 bombers... When to use the 1000 luft fighters to try to kill the 1000 USA bombers?... delayed, delayed, delayed...
What actually happened INSTEAD was that HITLER took Galland's private reserve, the 1000(?) fighters, STOLE THEM, and used them in the January 1, 1945 battle to attack USA fighters ON THE GROUND AT BASES IN FRANCE, DURRING BLIZZARD CONDTIONS, hoping to catch the P-51's ON THE GROUND. They did alright but they lost most of their better pilots... un replaceable!
Do consider that Germany's aircraft production went up and up until around Dec 44 / jan 45... "cottage industry"... planes were built by components in 'cottages'...
example: we all heard of the 'ballbearing' raids, Regensburg? or was it Stuttgart? I forget... but yes allieds high command were surprised that there were still luft fighters late in the war. Flown by noobs though, especially after jan 1st 1945. Operation Bastonge / Bodenplate?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bodenplatte
Luft fighters stolen by Hitler from Galland!

The above thing about luft fighters mostly stationed in Germany, and on Russian front, and only few in france... combined with this:
With the old saying "A P-51 can't do what a Spitfire can, but a P-51 does what it does over Germany"...
And "the bombers weren't safe until the long range escort... p-51"...
The p-47's had tried to protect the b-17's and b-24's but they couldn't do it for the WHOLE ROUND TRIP... After the P-51 came out,  P-47's became mostly ground attack or greeter planes escorting for a the way out and return?
So the P-51 arrived and... full round trip... then later on, they were cut loose to try to kill the fighters instead of just protect the bombers?

SOOOOO...
One has to wonder, and question... if the Spitfire wasn't escorting bombers to Germany, and the Luftwaffe mostly wasn't stationed in france...
Then how much combat did the Spitfire actually see after the Battle of Britain?
Of course it saw action?!?! 22,000 built!!!
1) Spits were surely in Africa, but a lot of these planes were also Huricanes, and USA's P-40's... 'Tomahawks' flown by English pilots off English carriers in some cases?
2) Spits sent to USSR... flown by who I don't know...
3) Spits were protecting Malta first from invading Italy forces?, then from Germany? for the whole war? Or was this all huri's? (Grats RAF Malta Defense!)
3.5) Some in Suez Cannal also? Some in Gibraltar protecting the Straights of Gibraltar...
4) Spits were, of course, stationed and protecting England incase Germany sent a raid?
5) Spits were also fighting zeros on the other front, Pacific Theater of Opperations... stationed in Australia?
Seems like a lot of 'guard duty' for spits as far as Europe goes?...
6) Were some in Itally? Monte Casino, and all that? Germany held off the allieds in Italy from mid war till just about the end of the war... Siegfried line? Kesselring line? (getting confusing)...
7) Spits tipping over V1 buzz bombs?

After June 1944, D-day... to the end of the war 'May 8th, 1945...
Allieds were invading Europe on Western front, Soviets in Eastern...
The end result here is this map:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupied_Germany


If Spit XVI's, both USA and ENGLAND powered types, were still based in England... then it would seem OBVIOUS that Spit encounters with Luftwaffe would be rare???
Short range fighter based far away?
Is this why England's fighter pilots didn't have sooo many kills? Mostly on guard duty?
Yes, the England had bombers, Lancasters etc etc, bombing stuff in France and Germany since middle of the Battle of Britain till the end of the war... what about fighters though?
WERE ANY SPITFIRES OF ANY MODEL/TYPE BASED ON EUROPE CONTINENT AFTER D-DAY?

Maybe this is why you guys have to go OVER AND OVER this issue about did Spit16's see combat?
Did any see combat? 22,000 spits made... I'm guessing, but I would like to see a graph of Spits total at the time, kills, and losses VS time... from 1939 onward... INTERESTING?
LUSCHE GOT A GRAPH?

Did any Spits at all, even earlier models, actually move onto the continent after D-day up to VE day? (june 6th 44 until may 8th 45)
Salute to RAF bombers... but for the Spits... does this explain its low sightings of Luftwaffe as some of you say?

NOT TROLLING JUST TRYING TO LEARN STUFF HERE... K?
fuel burn 1x please! - '1x Wednesdays?'

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #128 on: October 10, 2013, 11:21:04 PM »
WERE ANY SPITFIRES OF ANY MODEL/TYPE BASED ON EUROPE CONTINENT AFTER D-DAY?
There were many squadrons of Spitfire Mk IXs, Mk XIVs and Mk XVIs based on the continent after D-Day.  This is easily found, common knowledge.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #129 on: October 10, 2013, 11:57:37 PM »
There were many squadrons of Spitfire Mk IXs, Mk XIVs and Mk XVIs based on the continent after D-Day.  This is easily found, common knowledge.

Yep, it's even in the link Franz recently posted about Boddenplate.
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15667
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #130 on: October 11, 2013, 12:33:35 AM »
even squadrons of meteors were on the continent just saying  ;)

and yes please add them already Hitech!   :D
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #131 on: October 11, 2013, 12:38:24 AM »
even squadrons of meteors were on the continent just saying  ;)

and yes please add them already Hitech!   :D
surely. beg more.
AoM
City of ice

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15667
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #132 on: October 11, 2013, 12:42:07 AM »
you would love me to kill your 190 and 262 in a meteor repeatedly.  don't lie. 
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #133 on: October 11, 2013, 12:55:20 AM »
you would love me to kill your 190 and 262 in a meteor repeatedly.  don't lie. 
1: i dont fly 262s any more. Check the logs.
2: belive it or not, no, i dont want to kill you, nor to take any revange on you.
AoM
City of ice

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #134 on: October 11, 2013, 07:23:28 AM »
Seriously Werra, how old are you and where do you live?

Instead of using Wiki for Bodenplatte read the book Bodenplatte by Manrho and Putz (ISBN 1-902109-40-6) In it are listed all the Allied airplane losses which include Spitfire IXs, XIs, XIVs and XVIs.