Author Topic: Question or two about the Spit 14  (Read 3579 times)

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #45 on: January 21, 2014, 11:23:07 PM »
Figures, just about every WW2 single engine fighter had to do that to cope..

Hey, I bet you could make an argument that those wildly elongated stunt Grummans climbed faster because the extra tail weight pointed the nose higher.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline GAReaper

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #46 on: January 21, 2014, 11:24:25 PM »
Hey, I bet you could make an argument that those wildly elongated stunt Grummans climbed faster because the extra tail weight pointed the nose higher.

omg I wish I could +1 a post. Thank you for that BE I needed that laugh.
Bones87
56th FG Zemke's Wolfpack

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #47 on: January 21, 2014, 11:25:55 PM »
What, you mean they removed the tail-hook too?

Jest caint trust them dang cheatin' swabbies can ya...
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #48 on: January 21, 2014, 11:34:05 PM »
Hey, I bet you could make an argument that those wildly elongated stunt Grummans climbed faster because the extra tail weight pointed the nose higher.


& FYI, Grumman DID have to elongate the F8F fin/rudder to fix instability, viz incipient dutch-roll..

According to Corky, anyhow..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #49 on: January 22, 2014, 04:27:35 AM »
Thanks for the answer(s) to my questions.  :salute
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #50 on: January 22, 2014, 02:54:50 PM »
Hey, I bet you could make an argument that those wildly elongated stunt Grummans climbed faster because the extra tail weight pointed the nose higher.

 :rofl
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #51 on: January 22, 2014, 03:57:50 PM »
:rofl

Yeah, & how's YOUR tailhook hangin', A.A., - still draggin' yo' ask backwards?
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #52 on: January 22, 2014, 04:35:59 PM »
Yeah, & how's YOUR tailhook hangin', A.A., - still draggin' yo' ask backwards?

P-38s don't have tail hooks.  :D

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #53 on: January 22, 2014, 05:04:04 PM »
They were proposed for possible CV ops though A.A., do you know if it was ever trialled?
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #54 on: January 22, 2014, 05:29:03 PM »
They were proposed for possible CV ops though A.A., do you know if it was ever trialled?

USN didn't like the idea of such a large plane cluttering the carrier's flight decks and didn't like the idea of liquid cooled engines so the Model 822 never progressed beyond Lockheed's paper proposal.  As such the FO-1's (USN designation for F-5B) only operated from land bases in North Africa.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #55 on: January 22, 2014, 05:34:17 PM »
Ok, thanks A.A..

& the USN did trial P-51s though, & even paid to have Bell turn a P-39 in to a tail-dragger..

Wonder if there was some anti-tricycle undercart thinking there..

Mind you the F7F was bigger than the `38 & tricycle equipped, so who knows..

( F7F was limited to the biggest CVs too..)
« Last Edit: January 22, 2014, 05:58:41 PM by J.A.W. »
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7271
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #56 on: January 23, 2014, 08:36:17 AM »
spit 14 has low engine performance when off of WEP from 17,500 to 23,000 feet.

I never use WEP in that plane unless in a fight in order to coax 70 minute flights out of it.

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Question or two about the Spit 14
« Reply #57 on: January 23, 2014, 10:18:50 AM »
Ok, thanks A.A..

& the USN did trial P-51s though, & even paid to have Bell turn a P-39 in to a tail-dragger..

Wonder if there was some anti-tricycle undercart thinking there..

Mind you the F7F was bigger than the `38 & tricycle equipped, so who knows..

( F7F was limited to the biggest CVs too..)

Eric Brown landed a tricycle geared P-39 fitted with arresting gear on a CV.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.