Author Topic: Bring back F3 for the IL2.  (Read 1987 times)

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #45 on: February 21, 2014, 08:56:14 AM »
What has that to do with me?  :headscratch:

It's a simple fact that the utter majority of complains about Il-2 F3 mode did NOT come from GV players, but were a result of A2A action. Both in game as well as on the BBS. The threads and posts about it are still there :)

So if you KNOW (with period!) that only the far less frequent GV complaints are responsible for F3 removal, you must have some special sources not available to us yet. Care to share? ;)

I will finish my part in this, tho I have said it many times. First off I started the thread with a light touch as I have no illusions anybody is ever going to bring back F3 in the IL2 because hardly anyone flys it and I bet even less care. I did and since I pay my $15 too I'll explain my meaning one last time.

The only "special sources" Ive ever had have been comments in the forum and 'Waaaaa's" in the arena from the planes ability to open any tank at the time like a tin can in a near vertical attack where its NS37s were able to shoot point blank into the thinnest armor sections of tanks. OK, who likes to die, Ive Waaa'd once or twice too.

But the real butt buster is with all the flying ive done in it I have never understood how anybody was ever able to use it in F3 and effectively shoot other airplanes with it. And I tried it many times, both offline and on. It was just impossible for me to aim without the pilots sights and from what I can tell almost impossible for everyone else.

Barring one, who we will not name. ;) Its like only a very few guys have ever been able to fly those 234's around firing effectively out the arse end and hitting anything. I have no idea how they do it, nor do i think most everyone else does.

Your statement lusche implied that even you feared the F3 gun mode of the IL2 while in a fighter. If I never did I very much doubt you ever did. So thats what I meant by that.

Heres what F3 did do, for those of us who used it as it was supposed to be used. An anti-armor aircraft to protect airbases. Being in F3 mode allows one to line up the aircraft center line to the tank and gives you the extra SA and position to come down in a near vertical dive and hit the thin upper armor point blank with very little shot angle to bleed off ballistic energy. It was basically the equivalent of the way you turn inverted before diving into bomber groups from right over them which disorientates the gunners and gives you the edge. Just exchange that "disorientation" for 'thin armor sections"/"shot angle" and you know what I mean.

And i was damn good at it. I used to set convergence to 250 and kill almost any tank with 2 to 6 shots in one or two volleys of semi-auto fire, NS-37 only. I never carried any bombs cause i never needed any. The only tank that became a problem was the King when it came out. Every other one was meat, which shouldnt surprise because they were actually attacking an air base and it wasnt like i was flying to their GV bases with guns and ords  to grief them.

F3 also gave one a little extra SA to the rear to use the one or two moves the plane had to evade fighters. It was, and is, no fighter plane and is hopelessly outclassed by every fighter in the game. Every other medium bomber with F3 and/or bombs/guns has the same advantage the IL2 had. If your able to center your target in F3, start a bomb drop from close to vertical, your going to be able to bomb more accurate. The IL2 was NOT a special case. That it was the best tank killer in the game shouldnt have surprised cause it WAS the best tank killer in the war. Imagine if we could load PTABs in them?

So thats my theory. This game has turned more and more from a flight game to a Gv game. The IL2 was to good at what it did while in F3 against GVs. The GV'ers had the votes. The IL2 lost, and it was stripped of F3 while every other plane like it kept theirs.

There it is, spoken as a gentleman, I'll even throw in a smiley. :)............................. :salute
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #46 on: February 21, 2014, 10:48:49 AM »
*sigh*

This still going, eh?

Here is a very simple solution to this:

Give F3 back (and give the 87 G-2 and the Fi-156 F3), but make it so that you CANNOT use guns and ords while in F3.  This should be case for ALL planes with F3.

/thread
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #47 on: February 21, 2014, 12:24:31 PM »

Heres what F3 did do, for those of us who used it as it was supposed to be used. An anti-armor aircraft to protect airbases. Being in F3 mode allows one to line up the aircraft center line to the tank and gives you the extra SA and position to come down in a near vertical dive and hit the thin upper armor point blank with very little shot angle to bleed off ballistic energy. It was basically the equivalent of the way you turn inverted before diving into bomber groups from right over them which disorientates the gunners and gives you the edge. Just exchange that "disorientation" for 'thin armor sections"/"shot angle" and you know what I mean.



So your argument in favor of allowing F3 back with the Il2 is not that it allows some sort of unrealistic action when flying A2A, but that it allows you to be unrealistically good at lining up shots on tanks?  :rofl Wow, always nice when the other guys makes a compelling case against their own position for you.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #48 on: February 21, 2014, 01:07:15 PM »
F3 for the IL2?  No way.  It doesn't need it, it shouldn't have it, and I have faith that HTC won't bring it back.

As it stands, it appears HTC has the F3 views coded to the class of aircraft (bomber).  They have their reasons.  I wish they'd code something similar to the F3 mode, but only while in the gunner's position.  While sitting in the gunner's position the player is locked in to the view provided by the gun sight, when in actuality the gunner looked far more around the gun while scanning the sky for threats than he ever did looking through the sights or watching tracers.  Currently in AH, if the plane is classified as a "bomber", it gets the F3 mode which is all encompassing in every angle.  That is the kicker.

Forget the abilities of the plane, the role of the plane, and even the popularity (gasp!) of the plane.  Each plane should be limited to the views in which each manned position of the plane could actually use.  I vote for taking away F3 altogether if HTC would able to implement some sort of "near external" view for each position.  Perhaps allow for a view 8-12ft view out and away from the gunner's head and NOT from hundreds of feet away.  Make each crew position with programmable head positions just like the pilot, but allow the external 8-12ft "extended" view.

Im the short term though, I say F no to giving the IL-2 back its F3 gamer position.  The IL-2 has armor galore, THAT is the reason the pilot cant see like other aircraft. There is a trade off for such things.  You can't have your sippy cup and cheerios at the same time.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #49 on: February 21, 2014, 02:14:54 PM »
So your argument in favor of allowing F3 back with the Il2 is not that it allows some sort of unrealistic action when flying A2A, but that it allows you to be unrealistically good at lining up shots on tanks?  :rofl Wow, always nice when the other guys makes a compelling case against their own position for you.

So then take it away from the other ones who use it for the same thing.

Quote
unrealistic action
in a computer game is a slippery slope. I dont remember to many tanks shooting down aircraft with main guns in the war and certainly not as easily as in this game. Shall I go on?
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #50 on: February 21, 2014, 08:25:02 PM »
So then take it away from the other ones who use it for the same thing.
 in a computer game is a slippery slope. I dont remember to many tanks shooting down aircraft with main guns in the war and certainly not as easily as in this game. Shall I go on?
Got a problem with the tank guns? Are the sights wrong? Rotation too fast? Reload too fast? Anything? Anything at all? All you've got here is some folks who have become freakishly skilled at a low percentage shot in their vehicle because of years of practice. As opposed to people becoming good at F3, which is by definition inaccurate.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #51 on: February 22, 2014, 04:19:19 AM »
The only definition of what is or isnt
Quote
unrealistic action
in a computer game like this is each individual players playing style and/or personal preference. Or the personal wishes of the game maker. Historical reality has very little to do with what is or isnt allowed in the game. There is no Moses coming down the mountain with a tablet on which is described what is "realistic action" based on actual weapon system reality.

Personally i think its the right mix for a flight game. But on thing it isnt is "real". Not any plane, not any GV.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #52 on: February 22, 2014, 09:52:49 AM »
The game is a sandbox where you operate realistically modeled WWII equipment in any manner you like. HTC has neither the ability nor the intent to make sure you operate just like they did in WWII but they have the mission statement of modeling the toys to operate like they did in WWII. None of them had a "God's Eye' view
The only definition of what is or isnt  in a computer game like this is each individual players playing style and/or personal preference. Or the personal wishes of the game maker. Historical reality has very little to do with what is or isnt allowed in the game. There is no Moses coming down the mountain with a tablet on which is described what is "realistic action" based on actual weapon system reality.

Personally i think its the right mix for a flight game. But on thing it isnt is "real". Not any plane, not any GV.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #53 on: February 22, 2014, 10:01:59 AM »
You wanting Superman's POV to search for vehicles, and GVers wanting no GV icons (so they can simulate legally blind pilots), same whine different cheese.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18271
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #54 on: February 22, 2014, 10:05:27 AM »


The only "special sources" Ive ever had have been comments in the forum and 'Waaaaa's" in the arena from the planes ability to open any tank at the time like a tin can in a near vertical attack where its NS37s were able to shoot point blank into the thinnest armor sections of tanks. OK, who likes to die, Ive Waaa'd once or twice too.



This is the part I don't get, why can't you open up tanks like a tin can and create those "Waaaaaa"s" WITHOUT F3?

Just because YOU couldn't figure out the advantage of fighting in F3 mode doesn't mean there isn't one.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #55 on: February 22, 2014, 03:07:59 PM »
This is the part I don't get, why can't you open up tanks like a tin can and create those "Waaaaaa"s" WITHOUT F3?

Just because YOU couldn't figure out the advantage of fighting in F3 mode doesn't mean there isn't one.

I still can, tho not as well. But to really get that question answered you have to ask the legions who quit flying the IL2 after it was picked out in isolation.

I already said what F3 gave you so theres no need to repeat it.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Tinkles

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: Bring back F3 for the IL2.
« Reply #56 on: February 22, 2014, 05:28:16 PM »
I still can, tho not as well. But to really get that question answered you have to ask the legions who quit flying the IL2 after it was picked out in isolation.

I already said what F3 gave you so theres no need to repeat it.

It's the main plane I fly when going against tanks, and I don't miss often when bombing with it.  All without using F3. 

F3 (in my opinion) should only be on bombers that have gunners all around the plane. Like the B17, B24, B25 - the heavy bombers.  Because F3 and F4 simulate all the gunners looking outside the aircraft for enemy aircraft. The il2 only has ONE gunner, that can't even see below the aircraft. Meaning that F3 isn't for that plane. If it had a belly gunner then that would be different.

That's just my perspective of this situation though.
 :salute
If we have something to show we will & do post shots, if we have nothing new to show we don't.
HiTech
Adapt , Improvise, Overcome. ~ HiTech
Be a man and shoot me in the back ~ Morfiend