see you don't read at all what is said. 
c'mon man....please tell me when I ever said I want 1vs1 in the MA....
this is the crap that gets me.... 
I said I attack the biggest red dars there is...have always said that....
how do you get from what I type.....I want 1vs1 fights?
So you are basically looking to get attacked by a gang, presumably because you no longer find fighting just one person challenging? That's fine. But if you do that while simultaneously denigrating people for daring to attack with superior numbers ("gangtarding"), the cognitive dissonance approaches mental illness.
and the MA is a game about COMBAT more then it is a game about "team tactics"
Robert Shaw literally wrote the book on fighter combat, unsurprisingly titled "Fighter Combat". Literally half the book is devoted to flying a fighter as part of a team with other fighters, against other fighters in groups. That is generally how fighters have tended to encounter each other in war, singleton operations and 1v1 "duels" being the exception. When two opposing groups of fighters encounter one another, the side which communicates and coordinates better has an enormous advantage. In the MA, one can also generally expect to meet the enemy in groups. Now, one has a few options here. One may fly as a singleton and try to do one's best. One may avoid the MA altogether and simply duel, if that is one's preference. One may try to work with the green guys as a team as best one can, for better results against the red guys. This seems like the most logical thing to do to me, and as a bonus it encourages the study of multiple fighter engagements, which is a whole other world of tactics in addition to the various tactics of 1v1 encounters.
Or one may constantly complain, in-game and on the boards, that the opposition is not fighting fairly in some way. This option seems to me the least proactive and least satisfying, yet it enjoys surprising popularity year after year.
