I was reading his story. he was a good shot. he also followed a zero home and straffed him as he was landing. wonder if the japanese pilot called him a no skill dweeb 
.
semp
No doubt he would've, had he had a channel 200 and had he still been living. Bet what was left was pretty crispy, given the lack of self-sealing tanks.
As for the commentary, sure, in retrospect, it looks pretty easy. Consider, though, that the pilot in question could not have known with perfect certainty that, just for example, there weren't any escorts about or that he wouldn't get hit by his own flak. There was no kill shooter back then.
As for the turkey shoot, it was only called that ex post facto. It took real courage to go out and fly into that unknown -for the men of both sides. Nobody knew, before it actually happened, what the outcome would be. The same could be said for Bodenplatte. Neither side had perfect knowledge of the other.
It is only the most vulgar of historians that evaluates the past by the standards of today and with the benefit of hindsight. Being generous, I attribute this to simple failure of imagination as opposed to malice.
If you happen to be German (but especially if not), I'd suggest a quick perusal of Guy Sajer's Forgotten Soldier, specifically Captain Wesreidau's speech. The latter neatly predicted both the outcome and the ignorance of those that would evaluate what had transpired. Besides, the speech is both profound and prophetic and worthwhile under any context.
Finally, I sense a bit of ad hominem here, just because it was Vrac who posted. That seems unnecessary and an unfair transit to the subject of the post; a completely different individual.
