Try to read more carefully Kruel because I sometimes use big words. I said:-
"In my experience two relatively inexperienced sticks can give a more experienced stick more difficult ACM problems to solve".
I think you need to re-read the entire thread, this about 2v2s and bickering about rules. Now you mention a 2v1, stay on topic .
My experience is from consistently fighting many opponents on the deck alone in a plane that can't run once in that position. You can ask around if you doubt my credentials. So in this domain I'm inferring I know better than you. Which is a safe assumption.
Assumptions do not qualify as proper premises for a valid argument, inferring one thing or another makes your already invalid argument inductive in nature, to infer is to admit there
Is a probability that the conclusion of your argument is false. Probably is not the same as surely.
You think I
probably don't practice stall/turn fighting.
I can
surely tell you that I think it's a stupid way to fight, and I don't care to get caught up in it, especially in a multiple target environment. I try to fight my fight, not someone else's. My 15 bucks vs your own.
Your skillset will be a subset of theirs by then. Nevermind I'm sure there are plenty of reasons you can find to explain it away.
You're getting it now. But not really a need to explain as much as a want to disregard.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Let's be honest you enjoyed it a little more than you're letting on. Regarding competition, I know several sticks in this game considerably more competitive than you if studying your videos is anything to go by. Competitive and needing to win BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE are two different things.
More than I'm letting on?! I think I've been pretty honest that regard!
Again, you assume that you know exactly how competitive I am therefore can compare , I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just pointing out this glaring hole in your argument. (You're wrong though, lol)
"From a drop of water a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other". BnZ I learned in one month after the last (and indeed civilized) discussion I had with Skyyr. It was as I anticipated it to be. Why don't you spend a month stall fighting and then we can have a talk.
There's a chance your logician could be wrong.
Why don't you spend the rest of your life realizing that I don't HAVE to learn squat, if I am happy with results I am getting with what I choose to learn/practice. This is 9 months in, let's talk in a year or two.
No I think you have an ego because you behave in an egotistical manner.
Yes, but only because arguments like yours," fly this way, don't do this or that" that's not condescending at all
My argument is this: in competitive flights: You fly your way, I fly my own. In the end one will be left standing.