Author Topic: Cannons  (Read 1173 times)

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13197
Cannons
« on: September 22, 2014, 01:32:29 AM »
Why did colonial planes not have cannons?.
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Cannons
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2014, 01:38:46 AM »

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Cannons
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2014, 01:40:20 AM »
Because

A) their tests kinda showed 50cal was the best for their usage
B) they didn't have a decent cannon design
C) It's more practical to keep supply of a singe ammo type

Offline glzsqd

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
Re: Cannons
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2014, 01:47:32 AM »
The M2 Browning was as reliable as it gets and American pilots also liked have the extra ammunition. We didn't really have to deal with large strategic type bombers so there really was never a need for a harder hitting gun package.

Early Hispanos were prone to frequent jamming, especially the licensed built American versions(big reason the F4U-1C was not popular in reality)
See Rule #4

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: Cannons
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2014, 02:07:48 AM »
.50BMG has fantastic ballistics and was more than adequate to down any German or Japanese airplane.

I'm tempted to mail Zack a BMG converted into a bottle opener for christmas so he doesn't forget.
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3518
Re: Cannons
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2014, 03:14:55 AM »
I believe the last time the Americans traded cannon fire with the Redcoats, ours were bigger  :neener:

Although they may have been lent to us by Napoleon, don't recall exactly.
They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline Nypsy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 847
Re: Cannons
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2014, 10:38:00 AM »
Ah, a P-51 with four 20 mm's. A pickers dream.


Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Cannons
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2014, 10:56:21 AM »
The common belief that the US found the .50 adequate and didn't bother with cannons is completely wrong. Even pre-war the USAAF wanted cannon armed planes; the P-38 and P-39 were both designed with cannon armament. However, the Americans had real problems making their cannons work properly. The Oldsmobile cannon in the P-39 often could only get a shot or two off before jamming, and the US 20 mm Hispano development was a complete debacle of incompetence, institutional bickering and Anglophobia. So when war came the USAAF had to resign any hopes of cannon armed fighters and focus on the only reliable gun they had: The Browning M2. It was overweight (weighed almost as much as a 20 mm MG 151), but it was reliable and packed a good punch for the size of its round.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Cannons
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2014, 10:57:40 AM »
I believe the last time the Americans traded cannon fire with the Redcoats, ours were bigger  :neener:

Although they may have been lent to us by Napoleon, don't recall exactly.

The last time Americans traded cannon fire with the Redcoats was during the war of 1812...
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Online Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9402
Re: Cannons
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2014, 12:16:46 PM »
The last time Americans traded cannon fire with the Redcoats was during the war of 1812...


We used alligators in that one.

- oldman

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12794
Re: Cannons
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2014, 12:36:35 PM »






« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 12:38:09 PM by Slash27 »

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Cannons
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2014, 12:39:04 PM »
Because

A) their tests kinda showed 50cal was the best for their usage
B) they didn't have a decent cannon design
C) It's more practical to keep supply of a singe ammo type


Septics hate single ammo types, they prefer a mix of .50, .30-06, .30 carbine 7.62mm, 9mm, .45ACP, 5.56, 10mm, .38 special, and more recently obscure rounds like 6.8mm. I'm surprised they didn't go for the H+K G11 to add some wierd caseless rounds to the supply chain too :headscratch:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12794
Re: Cannons
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2014, 12:39:48 PM »

We used alligators in that one.

- oldman

He lost his head if I recall.

Offline zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13197
Re: Cannons
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2014, 01:06:23 PM »
We invented radar :old:
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Cannons
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2014, 01:15:56 PM »
In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.