Rook HQ

[CASHEW]

Got an issue with your hq going down? Defend it . IF you defend it and then it goes down it gives far more rights to whine.

[Someguy63]

I'd be a bit more upset to have to quit having fun in a very nice fight just to stop an eleven year old kid named Peanut1 who likes to brag about his virtual escapades of HQ destruction.


Honestly at this moment I think maybe you should stop making these threads as this started to get old very quickly.

[CASHEW]

I'd be a bit more upset to have to quit having fun in a very nice fight just to stop an eleven year old kid named Peanut1 who likes to brag about his virtual escapades of HQ destruction.


Honestly at this moment I think maybe you should stop making these threads as this started to get old very quickly.

Lol. your about 11 years off. I poking fun at other peoples inability to over come a very small issue, that historically to some point, did and will again happen.
 

[XxDaSTaRxx]

OP speaks the truth. 

[Guppy35]

Let me get this straight.  Your solution to finding a fight is to go for the HQ and hope someone comes up to fight you?

Wouldn't it be easier to just try some air combat instead?

I'm hard pressed to spend what little time I have to play chasing you down at the HQ.   I'm happy for you that you have so much time to play that HQ bombing raids are something you have time for.   But not all of us have that kind of time.

And to be honest it's gents like you that make me ask what the point of playing is anymore.

But you go ahead and enjoy yourself

[Someguy63]

Lol. your about 11 years off. I poking fun at other peoples inability to over come a very small issue, that historically to some point, did and will again happen.

Interesting. Can you tell me which historical moment this situation would be at all similar to?

Make sure you're serious this time, I don't think I could afford laughing half to death again.


Besides I don't think anyone would want to waste time upping to stop someone who wants to make the game a bit uneasy to play. It truly is annoying when I don't want to stop doing something I want  to do just to stop you.



What guppy said.

[Scca]

All it takes is to up a few times and have the HQ buster bail (since there is no downside to doing that), to sour you to attempting to defend it.  Additionally, if I wanted to fly circles at 30K waiting for bombers to come, I wouldn't be playing this game, MS Flight sim is what that's for. 

At least you know that people like you are personally responsible for driving people from the game.  Glad you have your priorities in order.   

[Lusche]

All it takes is to up a few times and have the HQ buster bail (since there is no downside to doing that), to sour you to attempting to defend it.  Additionally, if I wanted to fly circles at 30K waiting for bombers to come, I wouldn't be playing this game, MS Flight sim is what that's for.

On a map like Tagma or SFMA. a HQ raider can get NOE to HQ without triggering any kind of warning until he reaches HQ.
It's impossible to defend against that unless you circle over HQ all day, just in case.

[DmonSlyr]

OP speaks the truth. 

You guys are noobs.

[Slade]

Got an issue with your hq going down? Defend it . IF you defend it and then it goes down it gives far more rights to whine.

[10thmd]

Yet another "I stopped the fight worship me" tard.  Go cap bases or something constructive you knuckle dragger.

[SlipKnt]

Seriously would make it better if you harden the HQ a bit more so a single set of lancs can't drop it. 

Then it would take a little more energy to solicit help to go attack a HQ.  Much like getting peeps to get together to attack and attempt a base take.

It is simply too easy right now for 1 person to continue to drop a HQ.  I believe this should be a team effort.

I like taking multiple sets of B29s to go after a city strat then hit HQ.  Makes for a nerve racking flight when the enemy realizes there are 7 sets of B29s over strats and the 163s begin to appear.  Plus there is usually a DARBAR heading that way.  When you see a single DARBAR moving across a map, who really cares to go defend against it until the HQ is suddenly down.  Then bail out...

I think the only way to lessen the amount of times it happens is to make it harder to drop.  i.e. requires more ord than a single set of bombers.

 

 

[SlipKnt]

Another solution would be to lower the perk cost of the 163.  I know a NEWB with 30 perks might just up to defend in a 163 because they can...

Just a thought.

[Scca]

On a map like Tagma or SFMA. a HQ raider can get NOE to HQ without triggering any kind of warning until he reaches HQ.
It's impossible to defend against that unless you circle over HQ all day, just in case.

Yup, some people have class, others, not so much.  I guess if girls would talk to them, they might be nicer in game <shrug>

[FLOOB]

Rook HQ was destroyed because Rookland is weak. Everything else is just rationalization, excuses and sniveling. Weaklings whine that HQ should be stronger so that they don't have to be. That's all this is. Whining and excuses, the signature of the practiced loser. Pathetic.

The road to victory is paved with the bones of the weak.