So I was curious how different AC stack up against the N1K2, because I don't stack up well (1 - 5 this tour - ouch!)... I found, out of 37 fighters, 21 had a positive ratio vs. the N1K2 (the 190F8 is actually included in these stats, but it is a fence sitter, as it is generally an attack aircraft, and I tried to leave attack aircraft (TBM, Il-2, Mossie) out of the equation).
Some interesting things - in *general*, some of the 'worse', or 'more difficult' to fly aircraft fared better vs. the N1K2 - which I suppose means that better pilots gravitate towards the less obvious rides.
Every Luftwaffe fighter (barring the 190F8, which, as noted, is a maybe for our purposes anyway) has a positive ratio vs. the N1K2.
Some aircraft that you might expect to see a lot from (La7s come to mind), didn't make the cut.
Anyway, here they are - don't get mad at me - I'm not trying to make a point - I just looked this up, so I thought I'd share. They are arranged by descending by ratio.
1. Tempest - 36 - 13 (2.77 damn!)
2. Me262 - 120 - 45 (2.67 - surprise, surprise)
3. Ta152 - 17 - 7 (2.43)
4.(t) 190A5 - 217 - 123 (1.76)
4.(t) F4U1C - 218 - 124 (1.76)
6. 190D9 - 275 - 181 (1.52)
7. 109F4 - 159 - 113 (1.41)
8. 190A8 - 129 - 92 (1.40)
9. Typhoon - 288 - 215 (1.34)
10. c.205 - 236 - 184 (1.28) (no thanks to me! 0 -1)
11. P47D25 - 80 - 67 (1.19)
12.(t) 109G10 - 367 - 310 (1.18)
12.(t) Yak9U - 202 - 171 (1.18)
14. 109G2 - 78 - 67 (1.16)
15. F4U4 - 38 - 33 (1.15)
16. 109G6 - 135 - 118 (1.14)
17. Hurc2c - 308 - 276 (1.12)
18. SpitIX - 1184 - 1087 (1.09)
19. La5 - 54 - 51 (1.06)
20. Ki61 - 111 - 100 (1.01)
21. P51D - 640 - 638 (1.00)