Author Topic: A walk around Sikorsky “Raider,” contender for world’s fastest military copter  (Read 499 times)

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Sikorsky, beating the sky into submission since 1939.




Sikorsky gave a guided walk-around of the S-97 Raider, a proof-of-concept helicopter developed without government funding that the company hopes will earn a role with the military as an armed scout helicopter. The Raider is different from just about everything in the helicopter world, using a pair of counter-rotating rigid rotors for lift and a tail-mounted propeller for additional thrust, allowing it to fly at speeds of up to 250 miles per hour (220 knots) and hover at extreme altitudes.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline WaffenVW

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 360
Pretty cool, but is there really a place for a scout helicopter in today's drone-centric world? Isn't Sikorsky's R&D just a dinosaur?

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Pretty cool, but is there really a place for a scout helicopter in today's drone-centric world? Isn't Sikorsky's R&D just a dinosaur?

I would think it may have a CAS role
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: ,” contender for world’s fastest military copter
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2015, 06:34:45 AM »
Surely they could just give the job to the F-35?

 :headscratch:

 :bolt:

 :banana:
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline WaffenVW

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 360
I would think it may have a CAS role

Isn't that a role better suited for a full fledged gunship?

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Re: A walk around Sikorsky “Raider,”
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2015, 11:29:36 AM »
actually would probably be a good question for Ranger......

What you think Ranger?
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline Gman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
This is inevitably going to draw comparisons to the cancelled RAH66 Comanche.  I thought the Comanche was a neat little bird, so much tech on board such a small helo.  Very hard to hear, great radar/IR/Thermal low observable traits, good weapons loadout even when only using the stealthy bays (IIRC it could carry 6 Hellfire + cannon in low observe max mode, pretty impressive for something so small.)

Much of what I've read and been told about it being cancelled was due to budget as well as drone tech taking much of the recon, and even armed recon mission away.

The "Raider" is different in that it could help actually conduct "raids" by having a troop compartment, something the Comanche obviously didn't have.

Comparing it to the V22 Osprey - it's a bit slower, but not by a whole pile, carries fewer troops (6 vs whatever they can squish into a V22, probably double with full gear for a long patrol, and triple for lightly armed troops), but the V22 is very complex to maintain, is very, very large and hard to stow on the assault ships, and cost - they are claiming 15 million for the S97, which is a small fraction of what a V22 costs now.

Tough call, but I think the army would go with the S97 over a V22 variant any day, and I wouldn't blame them.

Small, low observable, very fast, easy to fly in all weather due to new tech avionics, very fast again (worth saying twice), and relatively cheap compared to other options.  Plus it can be armed with some decent suppression firepower. 

Interesting concept, I wouldn't mind seeing a version of something like this come along shortly, perhaps with more troop capacity, or more heavily armed.  Sort of like the JSF concept, but not all screwed up - an attack/recon variant, a transport variant, and so on.  My point is a pusher prop on whatever replaces the current observation Kiowas, Blackhawk variants, and so on.  The recon/transport end of flying wing fliers.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2015, 12:46:00 PM by Gman »


Offline WaffenVW

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 360

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Anyone remember the Cheyenne?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csGWV541yjw
Cool, thanks for sharing that. I've never heard of it. It's kinda pretty, in a warthog kind of way

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline WaffenVW

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 360
Funny you should say that because the USAF thought the Cheyenne encroached on their turf in the CAS role. In a compromise the Army canceled the Cheyenne and the USAF picked up the A-10.