AHIII F3 mode

[tuton25]

I really wish the F3 mode was fixed like it was in AHIII....

[BowHTR]

I really wish the F3 mode was fixed like it was in AHII

Fixed

[tuton25]

Fixed

lol, thank you

[Chalenge]

What are you really asking for? Are the arena settings incorrect? Is the farther F5 external pan locked in too close? Please, be specific.

[tuton25]

What are you really asking for? Are the arena settings incorrect? Is the farther F5 external pan locked in too close? Please, be specific.

Sorry, in AHIII the F3 view is automatically leveled when you are flying, and it becomes really disorienting if you are trying to shoot backwards in an AR-234 because the camera flops all over the place. In AHII the F3 view was fixed level with the wings, the same way the view changes in the standard F1 view.

[Chalenge]

Ah, yes I had noticed that, except I like it!

[BowHTR]

Ah, yes I had noticed that, except I like it!

same here cause it allows me to look around using TrackIR when taxiing

[lyric1]

Sorry, in AHIII the F3 view is automatically leveled when you are flying, and it becomes really disorienting if you are trying to shoot backwards in an AR-234 because the camera flops all over the place. In AHII the F3 view was fixed level with the wings, the same way the view changes in the standard F1 view.

Hopefully this problem will be fixed with the AR-234B update.

[FLS]

Hopefully this problem will be fixed with the AR-234B update.

There are other books making different claims as you know.

[lyric1]

There are other books making different claims as you know.

Yes and I have proven that they are wrong.  The one book you hold onto in particular that has Brown commentary that he makes no mention of any defensive armament & has a cutaway drawing with guns that he did not draw. I have found every AR-234B that Brown was involved with and have photos of all of them & none have rear facing guns.
The book that is quoted above was printed in 2015 not 30 or more years ago.

So find me the ones he flew or had anything to do with that had rear guns. You already contacted the National Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian.
They gave you the same letter that I have.
What do you know that a museum of that stature has wrong?

[tuton25]

Hopefully this problem will be fixed with the AR-234B update.

If this game was about 100% historical accuracy, then we wouldn't have Lancasters escorted by La-7s and Bf-109s being shot down by Zeros and 51s. I don't mind bending history a little to make the game a little more fun...

[lyric1]

If this game was about 100% historical accuracy, then we wouldn't have Lancasters escorted by La-7s and Bf-109s being shot down by Zeros and 51s. I don't mind bending history a little to make the game a little more fun...

Don't need to bend history at all when it comes to the AR-234B and having fun with armed versions.

[save]

If this game was about 100% historical accuracy, then we wouldn't have Lancasters escorted by La-7s and Bf-109s being shot down by Zeros and 51s. I don't mind bending history a little to make the game a little more fun...

We already allow 100% throttle in formations, everyone who have flown in formation know it's practically impossible,
and so is 4g+ turnfight in a bomber with full bombload (A20).

[Chalenge]

save, you're okay with mounting guns on a plane that never had them? Then why not put cannons on an Allison powered P-51? That would make the game a lot more fun for me, especially when I see Arados.

[Ack-Ack]

If this game was about 100% historical accuracy, then we wouldn't have Lancasters escorted by La-7s and Bf-109s being shot down by Zeros and 51s. I don't mind bending history a little to make the game a little more fun...

It would only be a historical inaccuracy if we were trying to re-create WW2 with AH3.  We're not, all we're doing in AH3 is using WW2 aircraft/vehicles to simulate aerial combat in our own little war over some wayward sheep.