The 109 was a.) a lot smaller in wetted area, b.) much draggier but total D in pounds was compensated for by the smaller wetted area to offset the 50+% greater CDparasite.
The last round of 109G-10 and K series were about as fast as the P-51D, even with 72" MP and accelerated slightly better intitially from medium speed envelope.
As near as I have been able to find, there is zero NAA 'official' thrust number for the Meridith effect. I spent some energy trying to calculate pressure drag of the radiator, exit velocity of the pass through air through the radiator with coils at 200 degrees F, estimating the mass flow rate of ambient air (at both SL, STP and 25000 feet), and exit velocity out the butt (closed) - assuming no mass flow rate loss and some other factors to 'assume' heat transfer rate into the 'system'.
I could never get more than ~30-40 pounds of thrust. BTW, that is about 30% of Max Exhaust Thrust (axis component) at 67". Then the other side of the equation is to apply the Drag of the Radiator duct, the stagnation Pressure against the radiator to figure out the Net. At 2x10^^ the Cdp for the radiator duct is .0019 (below 100mph). You have to go the CD vs RN to pick the correct CD (reduced) for RN for the velocity you are basing your calcs on.
Lee Atwood's claims of '300' or whatever else he stated was way overstated. You will note that Ed Horkey and Edgar Schmued never backed up Atwood's claims.