Hello All,
I'd like to request a new plane\role. The "
Spy Hunter". While those that use multiple accounts justify it that there were spys in WWII...so where "Spy Hunters" (or whatever name you choose).
This is a serious wish...but I dont expect those that game the game with spying to like it. The other 90% or so of us could have great fun with it.
Now we will not have the tools of the (WWII) day so I recommend using modern tech to fulfill the role just as the spys in this game do by owning a second computer or Virtual Machine (VM).
It is a sub game of intel gathering, i.e. finding players that exhibit the data points of a spy. Some attributes might include:
- Spending large amounts of time in at x\y vector. A hanger for instance.
- Correlating enme voice and text messages with that user and vector.
- Correlating air and GV activity post spy communication intercepts that link the player to enme base take actions.
The above can be found via MAC address isolation, source IP subnet isolation, IP packet routing\filtering (see wireshark), text channel string matching, text string position correlation, voice signature recognition etc. VERY doable. etc. etc. In short gathering ample intel on a player is a requirement to take action. The game can actually be programmed to do this for us (once the mode is enabled or requested on a player\vector).
EDIT: If any folks think this cannot be done accurately contact me outside this thread and I'll detail more deeply for you. I write books on this stuff.Next enable "
Spy Kill" mode, i.e. enable the ability to kill a friendly and not hurt yourself. I'd say because this is such a rare action only be aloud to execute it once per tour or whatever makes sense. OR perhaps require the vote of n number of your country to execute the action. Basically finding a balance to avoid gaming "Spy Kill Mode".
This is a working idea. If there are going to be spies in this game we should have a real option to take them out. Just as was the case in WWII.
Again, this is a working idea. Open for RFC.
Thanks for considering this,
Slade
