Nrshida asked for a discussion based on an idle thought. He didn't ask for agreement. A discussion is not a consensus. It's an exchange of views. We exchanged views until he started getting personal as usual. Learn to live with different viewpoints.
No no no. Stating your subjective perspective of proceedings does not make it reality. From
my subjective perspective (for balance) it was abundantly clear you objected to the idea from the outset, for no good reason I could see. Probably threatened an area you think is your domain I should imagine. It did not even cross my mind to consider this and nor should it. My motivation is to support HTC with their new Steam venture.
You had plenty of opportunity to contend the suggestion rationally and logically but instead you started with your usual informal fallacies, misdirection and feint personal insults or devaluations as you usually do when you don't like a suggestion but cannot make a rational argument against it.
I can happily live with different viewpoints. And I certainly can take criticism of ideation. You didn't do that. Your best line would have been to neutralise the importance I placed in new players taking time with BFM and elemental ACM
by themselves - my weakest element of the idea since I taught myself BFM / ACM and you are (allegedly) the expert in training and more importantly - Didactic method.
You might believe you make a convincing surface appearance of rationality and objectivity but your proclivity for unsupported personal preference & stealth trolling is becoming more and more obvious to everyone each time you do this.
Come up with a good idea and I'll support it.
This implies 1. We have to get your approval for any idea before it goes and further (false) and 2. That you are qualified to recognise and abstractly analyse a good idea (which I have to question since your imagination seems either catastrophically atrophied or absent in the first place).
