Author Topic: The Peggy never looked so good!  (Read 1508 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
The Peggy never looked so good!
« on: November 22, 2017, 11:38:13 AM »
No, I mean it... The Ki-67 has NEVER looked so good!






Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2017, 11:46:00 AM »
Very nice.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8097
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2017, 11:51:59 AM »
Excellent.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2017, 12:00:47 PM »
One, will the gear clip through the doors like it does on few other planes? Two, will she get her proper firing arcs that lyric pointed out?


I must say though, she looks DAMN HOT! :x
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2017, 12:05:58 PM »
I believe they gave the He111 gondola guns more range than they had because it accounted for the rotational ability of the mount. I suspect that might be what they do for the Ki-67. That is to say, it will cheat but the end result will be the same.

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2017, 12:19:31 PM »
What about pegging?   :bolt:
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2017, 12:54:45 PM »
That's the Val, the Kate, the Peggy.

Now we need the Boston, A20G, Ju88, Me163, Tempest, and Ar234B

That's a pretty short list! We're getting there! I say the A20/Boston will take the most time because of the internal spaces. The Ar-234B needs changes (no rear guns, period, but option for a forward pair in gunpod) The 163 and Tempest will probably be the fastest to update based on relative size and geometry of the models.

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2017, 12:56:38 PM »
Can we get an option on the 163 for upward aiming cannon?   :joystick:
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline FBKampfer

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 642
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2017, 01:01:33 PM »
The Ar-234B needs changes (no rear guns, period, but option for a forward pair in gunpod) The 163 and Tempest will probably be the fastest to update based on relative size and geometry of the models.

I've always felt like the Ar 234 would have made a decent heavy fighter if it had forward guns. I can't count how many times I've had a guns solution but no guns to use it with  :rofl.
AvA Development Group
Freebird SAC member

Great men are forged in fire; it is the privilege of lesser men to light the flames.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2017, 01:21:46 PM »
I've always felt like the Ar 234 would have made a decent heavy fighter if it had forward guns. I can't count how many times I've had a guns solution but no guns to use it with  :rofl.

I never liked how the 262 flies since they horribly nerfed its AoA capabilities. I find the 234 almost flies better than it now. Probably a more interesting fighter, lol!

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2017, 01:23:59 PM »
How did they nerf the 262?  I fly it here and there and haven't noticed any huge difference from AH2 to AH3.   :huh
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4693
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2017, 01:24:57 PM »
I've always felt like the Ar 234 would have made a decent heavy fighter if it had forward guns. I can't count how many times I've had a guns solution but no guns to use it with  :rofl.

Ar 234P...
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline Flayed1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2017, 01:29:55 PM »
 Thank you HTC!   KI-67 was always one of my favorite bombers to fly for porking bases.  She sure is perty.    :grin:
From the ashes of the old we rise to fly again. Behold The Phoenix Wing!

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2017, 01:37:55 PM »
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4053
Re: The Peggy never looked so good!
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2017, 01:38:01 PM »
Yep. This was a wish of mine. Looks good. She may be a ball of fire, but she's a fast ball of fire. ;)
Former XO: Birds of Prey (BOPs - AH2)
Former CO: 91st Bomb Group (H)
Current Assignment: Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group