Originally posted by indian:
I just read some of the post at AGW and thought of answering them, well I gave up ........<con't>
Hi Indian....
I wasn't going to respond to -spawn's thread either, but I did anyway. I don't think he gave it enough time to try AH. After two weeks, my opinion of AH was still very biased and low compared to WB. After 4 weeks, I was starting to really get into its unique offerings. After 6 weeks I was very comfortable in the saddle. Now I can switch back and forth with ease. I actually have found that by learning the AH game's flight model and gunnery, it has substantially improved my WB's flying and gunnery. Really weird and I don't know why, but I don't care. Lots of fun with both and I'm sure WWII On-line will have its own traits that make it enjoyable as well.
Damn, I love competition. The cream will always rise to the top. Capitalism at its finest.

AGW post as follows:
=====================================
-spawn....
I agree with daff, belongs OT...but..
I fly and pay for both AH and WB....BTW, took me over 6 weeks to get comfortable with AH after 4 years of WBs.
I really enjoy both and the people using them for different reasons.....
Yes, both have their share of a "Jim Jones" cultist following....
I am also looking forward to WWII On-Line.....
I'm an average grunt pilot in both, with little technical expertise in WWII aircraft....
Business is my expertise, so I fly these games for fun, not a lifestyle...
Guess I'm too easy to please, but I do get overly vocal when I see the management of any business making historical mistakes ....
That's usually when I get into deep trouble on the BBS's.

Good games, good people.....relax...enjoy...
Regards,
Badger
=====================================