Yes! Also, the hypothesis has been around for a long time and the proof of climate change is insurmountable, and the cause for that climate change is absolutely evident within the time frame that it has occurred. the only other rapid changes have been due to natural catastrophes like meteor strikes or cataclysmic volcanic eruptions. We have had neither of these in the time of the change, but we have had massive amounts of carbon released due to gasoline, coal and other human stupidity.
With a term like "climate change" It is true, the weather, the climate, and human belief all change. CO2 is a limiting resource for plant development. In all that human stupidity, that has allowed us the luxury of getting fat and using computers to communicate around the world, The Earth has continued to devour or CO2 outputs. We must remember that All plants evolved from systems developed with more CO2. With time the incidental demand for CO2 outpaced the earths ability to replace it, resulting in a long term, and persistent deficit of CO2. Despite all our selfish efforts, The plant life, Restricted by deadly and wide spread cold weather, continues to devour or CO2 release. Additionally, the oceans have have a enormous role in absorbing CO2 because of basic Laws of concentration flow.
What does it all mean? Time and time again "predictions" are wrong. Noble and funded scholars feel proud of their knowledge, and draw ignorant conclusions. Only to find they did not know "everything". Every single climate model is wrong, fundamentally flawed with incomplete assumptions. Any good scientist knows this and would not say otherwise. The latest grasp of knowledge moved temperature expectations back another 100 years in the future. Assuming we have any idea of what technology will be implemented 100 years from now is not more than a dreamy guess. Even more reason to question the prophets thought and motives. Ozone and sulfur are great examples of pollution problems being addressed and corrected naturally with time. Curbing CO2 emissions now and in the future will easily allow CO2 concentrations to fall. Look at seasonal changes, In one summer concentrations fall 100ppm, despite out outputs. Only recently has man made output exceeded the natural demand of available photosynthesis. One thing we Could be missing, What If other factors have large roles we are not correctly factoring. Another, what if were holding off a ice age, or are due for a upcoming ice age. Another, What will we do about our addiction to electricity. And, are real tough one, who decides who lives and dies, and how.
For me, It is troubling when teachers instill "facts" in our youth, when in reality they are still hypotheses. The attitudes that result are dangerous. It would be better is these vocal warriors would focus on facts. If you don't like pollution, complain about that. If you don't like eggs complain about that. But don't make eggs illegal because you think they raise my cholesterol, and that
will kill me.
