These are all viable options to deal with this issue.
I still believe a TOS is important. Here’s why:
- As FLS points out, a TOS informs players what is expected of them, so no one is surprised when a TOS rule is invoked. We respect this in the BBS all the time. But we need to know the rules before we can abide by them.
- It should not be on offended players to have to squelch or debate the “offending” player.
- Debates on harassment should not have to be settled individually. This is not why we’re here. We are here to vulch and get proximity kills.
-Oftentimes, the “offender” doesn’t know they’re being offensive (or as JimmyC eloquently put it, “being a dick”). They feel they are joking, or that it’s okay for them to say blah because blah. They don’t want to be lectured, and CH200 is not the place for culture sensitivity training. Having TOS makes it clear that it’s not acceptable under any context.
-Joachim makes a valid point - the “offended” people can just leave. It’s where we currently are. I don’t want to be part of an experience where people are mocked for their race, gender, orientation, etc. I don’t want to manage it on my own by private DMs or squelching. I wouldn’t tolerate it in a restaurant or in the workplace, against me or anyone else. And if management said it was ok for people to do this, I’d leave. So if HiTech says it’s fine, I’m out the door and you’ll all lose an easy kill.
-I don’t think people will suffer if they can’t discuss certain subjects or use certain phrases in the game. If you want to be able to say anything in CH200 so much so that you’re willing to leave the game, please speak up.
It’s up to the management to set the rules.
Mutha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk