Since "group activity" is a bit vague, let's try to be a bit more accurate.
"Most of the complaints so far are by players who have no interest in playing this game with against enemy opposition, or with allies of differing play styles."
It is clear that the whiners want nothing more than to play only with their ilk against auto ack and cubic structures.
Until you build a terrain for the MA, you never really catch on to what the MA is becasue you are not forced to work out those mechanics down to bridge placements across streams. Or round trip time for aircraft in field placements to help promote acitivty. You know group activity is not vague, you don't like what it means in totality to how the MA operates now days. You have only a single interest in how you want the MA to operate which at times you have railed at Hitech indirectly in your answers to player posts complaining about Hitech effecting what they like that you don't. I cannot build terrains for the MA that will accomplish your narrow interest alone and get them accepted by Hitech.
This is specious and self serving: "Most of the complaints so far are by players who have no interest in playing this game with against enemy opposition, or with allies of differing play styles."
They are one facet of loner style game play along side of the air samurais who think all GV's should be removed from the game or at least evicted from the MA. Just as most customers want to play as "group play" style which is how the majority of humans want to play these kinds of games to feel better about their potential outcomes. You have called them cowards who hide in the safety of groups since you have been on these boards. Those cowards keep Hitech's doors open with their cash flow.
Designing MA terrains is about balance of customer interests, not creating a myopic view of the MA. Which the radar test appears to be Hitech trying to balance something.
