This is an "I don't wanna play because the Axis have 4 jets" negotiation from the Allied side...leave the jets out!!!!
Leave em out....
Bump our Dora's and give us 152s
K4s are hard to use by noobs....
Come on Puller, you gotta do better than this. Part of your argument is there will be less LW. Not in the design. We aren’t talking about recruiting. Then you say K4s are hard to fly? Some dismiss their performance advantages? Lose the D9s and get 152s? Interesting logic.
As I said in response to Perdweeb. I know it can’t change at this point. Too late in the game to upend it. I wanted to understand the logic and express my concern.
One of the fundamental issues going back forever with scenarios involving buffs is giving the bomber guys a chance. In this event there is a small amount of bombers. Escorts are outnumbered as well. Now you have two 234s as scouts. Untouchable unless they are completely clueless, to find on group of buffs and direct the fighters to it. It’s tough enough when the scouts are K4s.
You talk about all those Mustangs. Yet they are matched and overmatched by the LW in performance and numbers. I’m a 38 guy, but I took a 51 to give myself half a chance. I’ve flown escorts in 38s. In this set up they will be at a big disadvantage.
Real simple if I’m LW CO. Send my 234s to find the buffs and run from the fighters. Then my 262s make passes at the fighters to disrupt the escorts. Then my piston engine jobs make a pass at the bomber formation and by the third hour the 17 guys are saying the heck with this.
In the end I worry most about the bomber guys as they are the hardest to get involved and the easiest to discourage. Betting on low LW numbers as a way to balance the game play is a poor approach
Again. Perdweeb answered my question so that’s it. I hope my concerns prove to be unwarranted. My previous experience gives me that concern