Author Topic: Head Ons...What's The Problem?  (Read 528 times)

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
Head Ons...What's The Problem?
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2000, 02:29:00 PM »
Andy,

HO's have their place.  They are a valid tactic, it's just that the HO tends to put you in as much danger as the other guy, so most smart pilots will avoid them.  The other problem with the HO is that if you try it at the merge, it forces you into a disadvantaged position if the other pilot is sharp.  I'll merge below the other fellow's nose if I can, and in order to HO me he will have to dive at me on the merge.  At this point I will evade and lead turn him in the verticle giving me both E and angle advantages at the merge.

The only thing that frustrates me is when a pilot uses the HO when he doesn't need to.  I've been all alone before vs. superior planes that have 5k advantage yet all they do is HO, extend, repeat.  Now I'm quite happy to dodge and eat up their advantage, but It's frustrating when they get a lucky shot from WAY out and put one in the canopy, especially when they hold all the cards and can engage me properly and win easily.

That said, much of the complaints I hear about HO's are not justified.  If any pilot is getting killed repeatedly by HO tactics, then he is going for the HO himself.  If both go for the HO, the best gunner wins, and even the winner tends to get blown to bits most times.  If a fellow comes at you head on and you try to line up and shoot him, you don't move in his gunsight... a stationary target and an easy kill.  However, if one learns to avoid the HO and most importantly RESISTS trying to shoot back, HO deaths are rare indeed.  I can count on one hand the number of times I've been killed by HO attacks in the last 6 months or more.  Even then, all but one or two of those were when I went for the HO myself... and died.  

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs
Visit Lephturn's Aerodrome for AH news, resources, and training data.
 http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/


"MY P-47 is a pretty good ship
And she took a round coming 'cross the Channel last trip
I was thinking 'bout my baby and lettin' her rip
Always got me through so far
Well they can ship me all over this great big world
But I'll never find nothing like my North End girl
I'm taking her home with me one day, sir
Soon as we win this war"
 - Steve Earl

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Head Ons...What's The Problem?
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2000, 03:15:00 PM »
Hi Andy,

I was and still am one of the leading anti-HO whiners. It's not that I don't use the HO myself, but I only use it:

A) When attacking a buff
B) When I'm low & slow and it's my only chance to survive.

Now, the HO is not the same thing as a front quarter shot. It's only a HO in my book when two planes are at the same relative altitude, with little angle of deflection. I have no problem with people who shoot someone else in the front-quarter, when that other plane can't bring it's guns to bear.

What really burns my cookies is when two pilots meet in a co-alt HO situation, and instead of even trying some ACM first, they simply start blasting at each other.

My most enjoyable fights happen when I meet another pilot co-alt, and we both hold fire until after the merge. Then it's an ACM fight to the death.

I may be in the minority on this issue, but that's what I believe. I really enjoy using ACM and watching my foe do the same thing. It really makes a fight much more enjoyable, whether I win or lose.

For what it's worth,

------------------
 

"Turning Knight & Bishop sheep into lamb chops since 1999"

[This message has been edited by banana (edited 05-23-2000).]

Offline Andy Bush

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
      • http://www.simhq.com  (Contributing Editor - Air Combat Corner)
Head Ons...What's The Problem?
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2000, 04:11:00 PM »
Lephturn and banana

Thanks guys...good points all, and I agree.

In response to my original question, most reasons given for not favoring the HO have a good and sound foundation. Technical issues aside, I appreciate everyone's desire to BFM the bandit. As a matter of 'fun', it can't be beat!

And when the HO is a matter of survival (for example, the low and slow bounce), it can provide a way to live and fight another day.

But, the mindless, pure pursuit HO technique does leave a lot to be desired...those that use it should get with one of the AH trainers and learn a different technique.

The HO reminds me of nitroglycerine pills...one every once in awhile might prevent a heart attack...but swallow a bunch and then jump up and down...well...you get the idea!!

Andy