https://www.acsh.org/profile/alex-berezow-phd
It's about the same (because both are history) as thinking a person with a degree in American History is equivalent, on the topic of Scipio's tactics in the Second Punic War, to a person who has spent a career researching the pickiest, finest details of the life of Scipio Africanus.
Most everything written about that paper will end up being slanted propaganda on one side or the other. If you care, you'll need to look for critiques by very specialized domain experts who don't have ulterior motives (such as previously published research that would be undermined by this paper, or who work for organizations with agendas for or against the findings of the paper). Conclusions by journalists, general-science Internet goofuses, government or quasi-government orgs, scientists whose previous work would be undermined if the paper is correct, etc. -- all of that stuff will be agenda-driven propaganda.
We'll see if the paper is ever corroborated or falsified as opposed to just being put down the memory hole.
