Ok then Busher… Webster's definition of communism... A system of economics where the means of production (manufacturing) is owned by the government
and therefore , because production involves people, a communist government therefore owns the people they rule

It's you personal conclusion after the "therefore" that I take exception with. Your definition also comes into question.
The formal definition that I found stated:
"a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs."
The assumption that people are both "owned" and "ruled" is why I suggested that your statement is a stretch.
But as I have said before, I am neither and communist nor a socialist, but I can also see shortcomings in unregulated capitalism.