Follow the science

[FLS]

but that is not the question is it?...

semp

No. It's a statement. The state of development is not an issue. In the normal course of events it becomes a human being. It's not like a skin tag.

[FLS]

For a Christian backed country we are hypocrites when it comes to abortion and the death penalty

We kinda twist that commandment to fit as needed

Eagler

We are a religious freedom country. That's a little different. We also have a constitutional separation of church and state.

[guncrasher]

No. It's a statement. The state of development is not an issue. In the normal course of events it becomes a human being. It's not like a skin tag.

but the original question mentions heart beat. there's no heartbeat since there's no heart at 6 weeks.  follow the science.


semp

[sparky127]

We are a religious freedom country. That's a little different. We also have a constitutional separation of church and state.

Can you point out the specific part of the Constitution where it says the wall of separation between the church (which church?) and the state shall not be infringed? It shouldn't be too hard.  In fact, something as important as that should be enumerated, right?

[Arlo]

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/885/establishment-clause-separation-of-church-and-state

[sparky127]

You don't know how to use Google?

Of course you wouldn't recognize a rhetorical question.. What are the abortion laws in Canaduh?  That famous "free" health care pays for abortions right up to the point of birth, right?

[Mano]

Follow the Science

When you voice your opinion cite the source.

Peer Reviewed Science Journals show their sources. A hypothesis is stated followed by data and an analysis of that data.
A theory is proposed. The experiment must be repeatable by the peers in the field of study when possible.
All sources must be cited. All instruments used to collect data are listed.

Another important issue is whether a statement concerning conflict of interest is stated. Who paid for the research?
Was the data cherry picked or was all data used because a sponsor might consider some data irrelevant when it is indeed relevant.
Did the author own stock or have a financial interest in the collection of his data.

Science is constantly evolving and moving forward. A theory today might change in 4 years.

Peer Reviewed Science Journals are not perfect, but it is much better than reading something a journalist wrote that did not cite his source
other than "from a reliable source'"

This is my two cents on Follow the Science.

 

[MiloMorai]

Of course you wouldn't recognize a rhetorical question.. What are the abortion laws in Canaduh?  That famous "free" health care pays for abortions right up to the point of birth, right?

For Canadians. Any American coming to Canada for an abortion will have to pay.

[sparky127]

Yes.. It all stems from an unofficial letter to a small church where the racist slave owning bigot Jefferson was trying to weasel out of getting involved in a local argument over whose gawd was better.  This is all implied hyperbole and the current SC would agree with me.

It's funny.. Lefties like to argue what one explicitly enumerated amendment DOES say, while arguing what another explicitly enumerated amendment does NOT say.

[sparky127]

For Canadians. Any American coming to Canada for an abortion will have to pay.

I understand why you can't answer the question.

[Arlo]

It was just the explanation you pretended to want. Didn't mean to upset you. 

[MiloMorai]

I understand why you can't answer the question.

Hard to answer when there is no abortion law in Canada, but its subdivisions and professional bodies
have regulations restricting the procedure to various grounds or gestational limits
There is also significant disparities between rural and urban access to abortion.

[sparky127]

Obfuscation, thy name is Milo.

[Arlo]

Obfuscation, thy name is Milo.

How so? Just asking, friendly like. 

[sparky127]

I understand.. You wanted the title all to yourself.